From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8019 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2008 02:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7985 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2008 02:47:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from E23SMTP05.au.ibm.com (HELO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:47:28 +0000 Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m322l3ox019660 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:47:03 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m322pEIS214402 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:51:14 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m322lOar013708 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:47:24 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m322lO96013703; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:47:24 +1100 Received: from [10.61.2.156] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1907378E; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:47:23 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc]: Fix typo. From: Ben Elliston To: Tom Browder Cc: gcc-patches In-Reply-To: <8bc817ee0804010346k5fcd16d5sf8d75b18a3019625@mail.gmail.com> References: <1207027909.8147.1.camel@localhost> <8bc817ee0804010346k5fcd16d5sf8d75b18a3019625@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1207104443.25017.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 > Ben, could I get your support for this attempted patch for the same > file? Joseph is very busy, but this is one the order of yours. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00102.html Sorry, Tom, I don't think this qualifies as obvious and I cannot approve it -- this is not an area I am a maintainer of. If you're still after approval, I suggest sending a ping and Cc'ing the maintainers you think cover the change (probably Joseph). Cheers, Ben