From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30184 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2008 20:55:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2008 20:55:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e38.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:54:49 +0000 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mA3Ks1eg021550 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:01 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mA3Ksa3s059664 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:40 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mA3Ks6q5016614 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:06 -0700 Received: from [9.47.18.78] (dyn9047018078.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.18.78]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mA3Ks4PD016449; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:05 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix g++.dg/abi/key2.C testcase on darwin (PR testsuite/37241) From: Janis Johnson Reply-To: janis187@us.ibm.com To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20081103202919.GM14706@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20081103202919.GM14706@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1225745673.6222.10.camel@janis-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 21:29 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This testcase fails since -O0 went to -funit-at-a-time > -fno-toplevel-reorder, as the _ZT{V,S,I}* objects are now emitted > in different order and __ZT{V,I}* which are in the same section > now use just one .section directive instead of 2, when __ZTS* was > emitted in between them. > Tested by Dominique, ok for trunk? OK. Janis