[PATCH] rs6000: Guard __builtin_{un,}pack_vector_int128 with vsx [PR109932]

["Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi,

As PR109932 shows, builtins __builtin_{un,}pack_vector_int128
should be guarded under vsx rather than power7, as their
corresponding bif patterns have the conditions TARGET_VSX
and VECTOR_MEM_ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_P (V1TImode).  This patch is to
move __builtin_{un,}pack_vector_int128 to stanza vsx to ensure
their supports.

Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P7/P8/P9 and
powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and P10.

I'll push this next week if no objections.

BR,
Kewen
-----
	PR target/109932

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_pack_vector_int128,
	__builtin_unpack_vector_int128): Move from stanza power7 to vsx.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def         | 14 +++++++-------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
index 92d9b46e1b9..a38184b0ef9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
@@ -2009,6 +2009,13 @@
   const vsll __builtin_vsx_xxspltd_2di (vsll, const int<1>);
     XXSPLTD_V2DI vsx_xxspltd_v2di {}

+  const vsq __builtin_pack_vector_int128 (unsigned long long, \
+                                          unsigned long long);
+    PACK_V1TI packv1ti {}
+
+  const unsigned long __builtin_unpack_vector_int128 (vsq, const int<1>);
+    UNPACK_V1TI unpackv1ti {}
+

 ; Power7 builtins (ISA 2.06).
 [power7]
@@ -2030,16 +2037,9 @@
   const unsigned int __builtin_divweu (unsigned int, unsigned int);
     DIVWEU diveu_si {}

-  const vsq __builtin_pack_vector_int128 (unsigned long long, \
-                                          unsigned long long);
-    PACK_V1TI packv1ti {}
-
   void __builtin_ppc_speculation_barrier ();
     SPECBARR speculation_barrier {}

-  const unsigned long __builtin_unpack_vector_int128 (vsq, const int<1>);
-    UNPACK_V1TI unpackv1ti {}
-

 ; Power7 builtins requiring 64-bit GPRs (even with 32-bit addressing).
 [power7-64]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3e3f9eaa65e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-maltivec -mno-vsx" } */
+
+/* Verify there is no ICE but one expected error message instead.  */
+
+#include <altivec.h>
+
+extern vector signed __int128 res_vslll;
+extern unsigned long long aull[2];
+
+void
+testVectorInt128Pack ()
+{
+  res_vslll = __builtin_pack_vector_int128 (aull[0], aull[1]); /* { dg-error "'__builtin_pack_vector_int128' requires the '-mvsx' option" } */
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3e3f9eaa65e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-maltivec -mno-vsx" } */
+
+/* Verify there is no ICE but one expected error message instead.  */
+
+#include <altivec.h>
+
+extern vector signed __int128 res_vslll;
+extern unsigned long long aull[2];
+
+void
+testVectorInt128Pack ()
+{
+  res_vslll = __builtin_pack_vector_int128 (aull[0], aull[1]); /* { dg-error "'__builtin_pack_vector_int128' requires the '-mvsx' option" } */
+}
+
--
2.25.1