From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10170 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2002 00:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10063 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2002 00:38:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 00:38:24 -0000 Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (cse.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA28063; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (law@localhost) by porcupine.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g150ZqK12749; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:35:52 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Richard Henderson cc: John David Anglin , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: ICE in 920624-1.c with -O3 -funroll-loops on vax-dec-ultrix4.3 Reply-To: law@redhat.com From: law@redhat.com In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:16:20 PST. <20020204161620.B19052@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 17:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <12748.1012869352@porcupine.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 In message <20020204161620.B19052@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson writes: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:37:13PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > Does this look better? The patch no longer removes the jump table... > > Grr. Jeff, we need a decision on how we're going to handle > this across the board. Agreed. As I mentioned, I'm extremely tempted to burn tonight and get rid of having a separate insn for the ADDR_VEC/ADDR_DIFF_VEC. Thoughts? jeff