From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30587 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2010 17:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 30578 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2010 17:37:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e9.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:37:29 +0000 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6JHL9AD025443 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:21:09 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o6JHbQpq131576 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:37:26 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o6JHbPSN005551 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:37:26 -0300 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (vorma.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.174]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o6JHbO8H005491; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix testsuite test cases slp-perm-[1234].c From: Peter Bergner To: Richard Guenther Cc: gcc-patches In-Reply-To: References: <1279304978.3166.1105.camel@otta> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1279561043.2635.5.camel@otta> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01517.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 20:02 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > > Sometime recently (r161984?) the compiler is now vectorizing the > > initialization loops for slp-perm.[123].c on powerpc64-linux. I copied > > the method of really disabling vectorization in the initialization loops > > used in PR testsuite/44538 by adding a asm ("") into the loops we don't > > want vectorized. For safety, I did the same for the check_results loops. > > Looking closer, I also noticed the loop limits for the check_results > > loop were bogus for slp-perm-[34].c, so I fixed those too. > > > > Ok for mainline? > > Ok. Thanks, committed as revision 162311. Peter