From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:56:09 +0300 (MSK) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283e0c0-5831-bb81-a370-c8c14b133f76@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57b3ae5e-8f15-8bea-fa09-39bccbaa2414@codesourcery.com>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> @Tom and Alexander: Better suggestions are welcome for the busy loop in
> libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c regarding the variable placement and checking
> its value.
I think to do that without polling you can use PTX 'brkpt' instruction on the
device and CUDA Debugger API on the host (but you'd have to be careful about
interactions with the real debugger).
How did the standardization process for this feature look like, how did it pass
if it's not efficiently implementable for the major offloading targets?
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 9:07 Tobias Burnus
2022-08-26 9:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-08-26 14:56 ` Alexander Monakov [this message]
2022-09-09 15:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-09-09 15:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-09-13 7:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-21 20:06 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-09-26 15:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-26 17:45 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-09-27 9:23 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-28 13:16 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-02 18:13 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-07 14:26 ` [Patch][v5] " Tobias Burnus
2022-10-11 10:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-11 11:12 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-12 8:55 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-17 7:35 ` *ping* / " Tobias Burnus
2022-10-19 15:53 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-24 14:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-24 19:05 ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-10-24 19:11 ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-10-24 19:46 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-24 19:51 ` libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling, resolve spurious SIGSEGVs (was: [Patch][v5] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling) Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-21 15:53 ` libgomp: Simplify OpenMP reverse offload host <-> device memory copy implementation (was: [Patch] " Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-24 15:43 ` [og12] " Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28 8:48 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-28 9:31 ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28 10:51 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-04 14:40 ` [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28 8:28 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-28 9:23 ` Thomas Schwinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283e0c0-5831-bb81-a370-c8c14b133f76@ispras.ru \
--to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).