From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27578 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2010 16:20:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 27565 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2010 16:20:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:20:22 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:20:18 +0000 Received: from [10.1.66.29] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:20:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vectorize conversions directly From: Ramana Radhakrishnan Reply-To: ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com To: Dmitry Plotnikov Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rearnsha@arm.com, IRAR@il.ibm.com, dm@ispras.ru In-Reply-To: <4CED2DDC.1020604@ispras.ru> References: <4CED2DDC.1020604@ispras.ru> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1290702014.30806.167.camel@e102325-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: 110112516201800301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg02552.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 18:23 +0300, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote: > Hi, > It's hard to make such fix in arm backend, because neon builtins are not= saved and=20 > enumerated as it's done for x86_64 and rs6000. Bootstrapped and=20 > regtested on x86_64 without any regressions. IIRC there was this patch / set of patches from Jie that did implement TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL if that's what was needed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00851.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00853.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00852.html I haven't looked at your patch in great detail but ...=20 > + (UNSPEC_FIXU 208) > + (UNSPEC_FLOATU 209)]) These don't seem to get used anywhere else. Are they really needed or are some other portions of your patch missing ?=20 Cheers Ramana