From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-404220-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 80421 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2015 15:32:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80399 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2015 15:32:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f171.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:32:02 +0000
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so206053956wic.1;        Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.19.65 with SMTP id c1mr6801400wie.15.1438183919281;        Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.6] (chp127.enscp.fr. [193.51.253.127])        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k12sm32674150wjw.4.2015.07.29.08.31.58        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);        Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: [Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules - part 3/3
From: FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150729151154.GK3335@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:15:00 -0000
Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>, Damian Rouson <damian@sourceryinstitute.org>, Mikael Morin <mikael.morin@sfr.fr>, "Bader, Reinhold" <Reinhold.Bader@lrz.de>, "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "salvatore.filippone@uniroma2.it" <salvatore.filippone@uniroma2.it>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12CFFDD1-93B6-49D9-834A-03B307506CC2@gmail.com>
References: <CAGkQGiJ-HQA97YRC0fSjR4KFxS=7ft8ci6YjYyO7AWGi_md+cw@mail.gmail.com> <55B10B58.9000302@sfr.fr> <CAGkQGi+NODX-wo+HKOf1V9nD8PHUVdH9OSU_vaDHJct20DP0Tw@mail.gmail.com> <00370BD5-507A-42BF-9D59-E868BBAD3C94@sourceryinstitute.org> <CAGkQGiJDdTKbBrUYa-wG4iKHM7brF8=sGT=O6-gNgEEmfo0RXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150729151154.GK3335@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02481.txt.bz2

> Why do you initialize a static variable to false?

You mean because false is equal to zero and it will be the default initiali=
zation anyway?
I quite like that the default value is explicit.

FX