From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21269 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2011 14:45:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21218 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2011 14:45:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:44:59 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:44:57 +0100 Received: from [10.1.67.34] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:44:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [ARM] Define unspecs using define_c_enum From: Richard Earnshaw To: Richard Sandiford Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1301496294.8492.57.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: 111033015445702301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg02080.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 15:38 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This ARM patch allows *UNSPEC_* constants to be printed in dump files. > It's very much a target decision whether this is worth doing, but just > in case... >=20 > ...tested on arm-linux-gnueabi. OK to install? >=20 > Richard >=20 >=20 > gcc/ > * config/arm/neon.md: Use define_c_enum to define UNSPEC* and > VUNSPEC* constants. > * config/arm/arm.md: Likewise. Move the synchronization ones to... > * config/arm/sync.md: ...here. >=20 Hmm, seems we have two patches posted to do this. I've just approved an earlier post that came in while we were in pre-release lock-down. R.