From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-288719-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14029 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2011 12:20:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 14006 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2011 12:20:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:20:06 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:20:02 +0100
Received: from [10.1.67.34] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);	 Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:20:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Tom de Vries <vries@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <4D9AF22E.7030000@codesourcery.com>
References: <4D94C603.7080505@codesourcery.com>	 <4D94C787.4060207@codesourcery.com>  <4D95E587.8090404@codesourcery.com>	 <1301672077.4104.15.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com>	 <4D95F905.6010901@codesourcery.com>  <4D9AF22E.7030000@codesourcery.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:20:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1302006001.25036.9.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 111040513200205101
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2


On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:42 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>=20
> On 04/01/2011 06:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 04/01/2011 05:34 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:47 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>> Reposting, with ChangeLog.
> >>
> >> +/* { dg-options "-march=3Darmv7-a -mthumb -Os" } */
> >>
> >> No, use dg-require-effective-target.  The above doesn't work properly
> >> with multilib testing.
> >>
> >=20
> > Changed it into:
> >=20
> > +/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os" }  */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2_ok } */
> >=20
>=20
> Is this updated version (
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00058.html ) ok for trunk?
>=20

Yes, thanks.

R.