From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16424 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2011 18:04:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 16413 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2011 18:04:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com (HELO g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com) (15.193.32.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:04:29 +0000 Received: from g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com [16.228.8.141]) by g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0C3CA7F; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.89.92.85] (hpsje.cup.hp.com [16.89.92.85]) by g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44242011B; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Initialize INSN_COND (was: C6X port 5/11: Track predication conditions more accurately) From: Steve Ellcey Reply-To: sje@cup.hp.com To: Alexander Monakov Cc: Andrey Belevantsev , Bernd Schmidt , GCC Patches In-Reply-To: <1307122663.2556.499.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> References: <201105311824.p4VIOf007288@lucas.cup.hp.com> <4DE5489F.4020005@hotbox.ru> <4DE5F5DF.7090407@ispras.ru> <1306942802.2556.281.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <1307053817.2556.352.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <1307122663.2556.499.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1307124266.2556.507.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 > Note that I am using r174594 sources with your patch *AND* with the patch > Bernd proposed for PR 48673 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02470.html). > So this regression may be due to the other change. I will look into it some > more to see if I can figure out which change is causing this regression. I did not > see any other regressions. > > Steve Ellcey > sje@cup.hp.com Alexander, Following up to my own email, removing Bernd's patch for PR 48673 did not make this failure go away. But Bernd's patch does fix the gfortran.dg/sms-* failures I reported in PR 48673 so unless you or Andrey have an objection to it, I would like to approve that patch for checkin. Steve Ellcey sje@cup.hp.com