From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9224 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 18:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 9214 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2012 18:55:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dns1.mips.com (HELO dns1.mips.com) (12.201.5.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:55:02 +0000 Received: from mailgate1.mips.com (mailgate1.mips.com [12.201.5.111]) by dns1.mips.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBLIt0N7024831; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:55:01 -0800 X-M-MSG: Received: from exchdb01.mips.com (unknown [192.168.36.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate1.mips.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204DE364667; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:55:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.65.53] (192.168.65.53) by exchhub01.mips.com (192.168.36.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:55:00 -0800 Subject: Re: [Patch, PR 54128] ira.c change to fix mips bootstrap From: Steve Ellcey To: Jakub Jelinek CC: In-Reply-To: <20121221074618.GD2315@tucnak.redhat.com> References: <20121221074618.GD2315@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1356116099.31899.24.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EMS-Proccessed: 6LP3oGfGVdcdb8o1aBnt6w== X-EMS-STAMP: sR4kJsoU+brrL5fem90ZcA== Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01337.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 08:46 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Given Alex' comments in the PR, the second hunk is definitely ok for trunk, > the first one can be applied too (but you can skip it too if you want, it > shouldn't make a difference). Thanks, I checked in both chunks. Steve Ellcey sellcey@mips.com