public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033
  2013-01-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
@ 2013-01-29 14:40 ` Sebastian Huber
  2013-01-29 14:42   ` Sebastian Huber
  2013-02-06  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Huber @ 2013-01-29 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Sebastian Huber

2013-01-29  Sebastian Huber  <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>

	PR target/55033
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c: New.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd8abcb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr55033.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_eabi_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcpu=8540 -msoft-float -msdata=eabi -G 8 -fno-common" } */
+
+void f(void);
+
+struct s {
+  int *p;
+  int *q;
+};
+
+extern int a;
+
+extern const struct s c;
+
+const struct s c = { &a, 0 };
+
+void f(void)
+{
+  char buf[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+}
-- 
1.7.7

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
@ 2013-01-29 14:40 Sebastian Huber
  2013-01-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033 Sebastian Huber
  2013-02-06  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Huber @ 2013-01-29 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Sebastian Huber

2013-01-18  Sebastian Huber  <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>

	* lib/target-supports.exp
	(check_effective_target_powerpc_eabi_ok): New.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c: Use require effective target
	powerpc_eabi_ok.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c: Add powerpc-*-rtems*.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c: Do not run, compile
	only.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c        |    3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c    |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c     |    3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c     |    2 +-
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c          |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c         |    2 +-
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c          |    3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp              |   12 ++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c
index 47ba1a7..cd15586 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* PR target/16952 */
-/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_eabi_ok } */
 /* { dg-options "-meabi -mrelocatable" } */
 char *s = "boo";
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c
index da6001f..ffb4264 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do run { target powerpc*-*-eabi* powerpc*-*-elf* powerpc*-*-linux* } } */
+/* { dg-do run { target powerpc*-*-eabi* powerpc*-*-elf* powerpc*-*-linux* powerpc*-*-rtems* } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -mlong-double-128" } */
 
 #include <stdlib.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c
index 5f39d86..efd5a5e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } || { powerpc-*-eabi* } } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-common -G 8 -meabi -msdata=eabi" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_eabi_ok } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target nonpic } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\\.section\[ \t\]\\.sdata," } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\\.section\[ \t\]\\.sdata2," } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c
index f102b1d..570c81f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } || { powerpc-*-eabi* } } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } || { powerpc-*-eabi* powerpc-*-rtems* } } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-common -G 8 -msdata=sysv" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target nonpic } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\\.section\[ \t\]\\.sdata," } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c
index 465fc41..59bd39f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do run { target powerpc*-*-linux* powerpc*-*-eabi* } } */
+/* { dg-do run { target powerpc*-*-linux* powerpc*-*-eabi* powerpc-*-rtems* } } */
 /* { dg-options {} } */
 
 /* Test stack pointer alignment against variable alloca.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c
index 37b7d65..2ac118c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* PR target/51623 */
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } || { powerpc-*-eabi* } } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-linux* && ilp32 } || { powerpc-*-eabi* powerpc-*-rtems* } } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-mrelocatable -ffreestanding" } */
 
 /* This generated an error, since the compiler was calling
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c
index 2a466e3..5354e49 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* Verify that we don't ICE trying to put float data in .sdata2.  */
-/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-linux* && powerpc_spe } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_eabi_ok } */
 /* { dg-options "-msdata=eabi -mcall-eabi -G 8" } */
 
 double x;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 8b2fa29..5c3d9cc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -2605,6 +2605,18 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_prefer_ldrd_strd { } {
     }  "-O2 -mthumb" ]
 }
 
+# Return 1 if this is a PowerPC target supporting -meabi.
+
+proc check_effective_target_powerpc_eabi_ok { } {
+    if { [istarget powerpc*-*-*] } {
+	return [check_no_compiler_messages powerpc_eabi_ok object {
+	    int dummy;
+	} "-meabi"]
+    } else {
+	return 0
+    }
+}
+
 # Return 1 if this is a PowerPC target with floating-point registers.
 
 proc check_effective_target_powerpc_fprs { } {
-- 
1.7.7

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033
  2013-01-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033 Sebastian Huber
@ 2013-01-29 14:42   ` Sebastian Huber
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Huber @ 2013-01-29 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Test results with these patches are here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg03064.html

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-01-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
  2013-01-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033 Sebastian Huber
@ 2013-02-06  9:20 ` Sebastian Huber
  2013-02-06 20:44   ` Mike Stump
  2013-02-06 20:53   ` Mike Stump
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Huber @ 2013-02-06  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Would someone mind having a look at this.

On 01/29/2013 03:38 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> 2013-01-18  Sebastian Huber  <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
>
> 	* lib/target-supports.exp
> 	(check_effective_target_powerpc_eabi_ok): New.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-eabi.c: Use require effective target
> 	powerpc_eabi_ok.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-sdata-2.c: Add powerpc-*-rtems*.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr51623.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-stackalign-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-ldstruct.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/spe-small-data-2.c: Do not run, compile
> 	only.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-02-06  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
@ 2013-02-06 20:44   ` Mike Stump
  2013-02-06 20:53   ` Mike Stump
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2013-02-06 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sebastian Huber; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Would someone mind having a look at this.

GIven where we are in the release cycle, I'd prefer a ppc person to double check (by reviewing and approving).  I don't see reason why it cannot be approved...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-02-06  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
  2013-02-06 20:44   ` Mike Stump
@ 2013-02-06 20:53   ` Mike Stump
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2013-02-06 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sebastian Huber; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Would someone mind having a look at this.

GIven where we are in the release cycle, I'd prefer a ppc person to double check (by reviewing and approving).  I don't see reason why it cannot be approved…

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-02-09  0:07   ` David Edelsohn
@ 2013-02-11  7:56     ` Sebastian Huber
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Huber @ 2013-02-11  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: Peter Bergner, GCC Patches, Mike Stump

On 02/09/2013 01:07 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 17:19 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> Because Peter Bergner most recently worked on embedded PPC targets, I
>>> had asked him to double-check the patch before approving it.
>>> Hopefully he will give me some feedback soon.
>>
>> I've had a look at the patch and it looks good to me.
>> I also gave it a spin through a powerpc64-linux build and
>> testsuite run just to make sure nothing unexpectedly popped
>> out and nothing did.  So I'm fine with the patch.
>
> Sebastian,
>
> The patches are okay.

Thanks a lot for your reviews.

>
> Are you able to check them in?

I don't have commit access, but my company and I have signed the copyright 
assignments regarding GCC with the FSF.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-02-08 22:06 ` Peter Bergner
@ 2013-02-09  0:07   ` David Edelsohn
  2013-02-11  7:56     ` Sebastian Huber
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2013-02-09  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Bergner, Sebastian Huber; +Cc: GCC Patches, Mike Stump

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 17:19 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Because Peter Bergner most recently worked on embedded PPC targets, I
>> had asked him to double-check the patch before approving it.
>> Hopefully he will give me some feedback soon.
>
> I've had a look at the patch and it looks good to me.
> I also gave it a spin through a powerpc64-linux build and
> testsuite run just to make sure nothing unexpectedly popped
> out and nothing did.  So I'm fine with the patch.

Sebastian,

The patches are okay.

Are you able to check them in?

Thanks, David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
  2013-02-06 22:19 David Edelsohn
@ 2013-02-08 22:06 ` Peter Bergner
  2013-02-09  0:07   ` David Edelsohn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Peter Bergner @ 2013-02-08 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: Sebastian Huber, GCC Patches, Mike Stump

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 17:19 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Because Peter Bergner most recently worked on embedded PPC targets, I
> had asked him to double-check the patch before approving it.
> Hopefully he will give me some feedback soon.

I've had a look at the patch and it looks good to me.
I also gave it a spin through a powerpc64-linux build and
testsuite run just to make sure nothing unexpectedly popped
out and nothing did.  So I'm fine with the patch.

Peter



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up
@ 2013-02-06 22:19 David Edelsohn
  2013-02-08 22:06 ` Peter Bergner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2013-02-06 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sebastian Huber, Peter Bergner; +Cc: GCC Patches, Mike Stump

Because Peter Bergner most recently worked on embedded PPC targets, I
had asked him to double-check the patch before approving it.
Hopefully he will give me some feedback soon.

Thanks, David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-11  7:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
2013-01-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] Test case for PR55033 Sebastian Huber
2013-01-29 14:42   ` Sebastian Huber
2013-02-06  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC testsuite clean up Sebastian Huber
2013-02-06 20:44   ` Mike Stump
2013-02-06 20:53   ` Mike Stump
2013-02-06 22:19 David Edelsohn
2013-02-08 22:06 ` Peter Bergner
2013-02-09  0:07   ` David Edelsohn
2013-02-11  7:56     ` Sebastian Huber

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).