From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5646 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2013 18:20:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5637 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2013 18:20:46 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e8.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.138) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:20:41 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:20:39 +0100 Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.167) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.108) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:20:36 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9816E805F for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:20:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r7MIKZjq36438184 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:20:35 GMT Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r7MIKZuk022949 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:20:35 -0300 Received: from [9.10.86.99] (oc8801110288.ibm.com.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.99]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r7MIKXOs022828; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:20:33 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH]. Fix HAVE_SYS_SDT_H for cross-compilation From: Bill Schmidt To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: christian.bruel@st.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, antonb@au1.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20130822174700.GE1814@tucnak.redhat.com> References: <1377182388.17827.4.camel@oc8801110288.ibm.com> <20130822174700.GE1814@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1377195633.17827.6.camel@oc8801110288.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13082218-0320-0000-0000-000000C5BBA3 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg01298.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 19:47 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:39:48AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > > Hi Christian and Jakub, > > > > I'm curious whether there was ever any resolution for: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01124.html. > > The last mail I remember didn't make any sense: > #include "tconfig.h" > > that includes it: > > #ifndef GCC_TCONFIG_H > #define GCC_TCONFIG_H > #ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET > # define USED_FOR_TARGET > #endif > #include "auto-host.h" > > in which there is : > > #ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET > #define HAVE_SYS_SDT_H 1 > #endif > > That means USED_FOR_TARGET is defined and thus HAVE_SYS_SDT_H is never > defined, which is not desirable. > > Jakub > Yes, that doesn't seem right at all. OK, thanks. I'll stick this on a list as a low-priority item to fix one of these days. Thanks, Bill