From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17129 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2014 19:58:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17118 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2014 19:58:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:58:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7JJwAmw016244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:58:11 -0400 Received: from [10.3.225.110] (vpn-225-110.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.110]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7JJw92d016408; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:58:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1408478101.2473.106.camel@surprise> Subject: Re: [PATCH 029/236] rtl_data.x_parm_birth_insn is an insn From: David Malcolm To: Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <53EB6BD3.6020304@redhat.com> References: <1407345815-14551-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1407345815-14551-30-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <53EB6BD3.6020304@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01940.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/06/14 11:20, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > * function.h (struct rtl_data): Strengthen field > > "x_parm_birth_insn" from rtx to rtx_insn *. > > * function.c (struct assign_parm_data_all): Strengthen fields > > "first_conversion_insn" and "last_conversion_insn" from rtx to > > rtx_insn *. > OK. I think at this point any patch which merely changes the type of > some variable or in a signature from rtx to rtx_insn (or any of the > concrete passes) is considered trivial enough to go forward without > explicit review. > > That applies to patches in this series, additions you may need to make > due to changes in the tree since you last rebased and further > strengthening you or anyone else may want to tackle. Thanks. Committed to trunk as r214191.