From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Generate LE code for vec_lvsl and vec_lvsr that is compatible with BE code
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412090663.2986.50.camel@gnopaine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140930145024.GB29948@gate.crashing.org>
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > The method used in this patch is to perform a byte-reversal of the
> > result of the lvsl/lvsr. This is accomplished by loading the vector
> > char constant {0,1,...,15}, which will appear in the register from left
> > to right as {15,...,1,0}. A vperm instruction (which uses BE element
> > ordering) is applied to the result of the lvsl/lvsr using the loaded
> > constant as the permute control vector.
>
> It would be nice if you could arrange the generated sequence such that
> for the common case where the vec_lvsl feeds a vperm it is results in
> just lvsr;vnot machine instructions. Not so easy to do though :-(
Yes -- as you note, that only works when feeding a vperm, which is what
we expect but generally a lot of work to prove. Again, this is
deprecated usage so it seems not worth spending the effort on this...
>
> Some minor comments...
>
> > -(define_insn "altivec_lvsl"
> > +(define_expand "altivec_lvsl"
> > + [(use (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" ""))
> > + (use (match_operand:V16QI 1 "memory_operand" "Z"))]
>
> A define_expand should not have constraints.
Thanks for catching this -- that one slipped through (pasto).
>
> > + "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
> > + "
>
> No need for the quotes.
Ok.
>
> > +{
> > + if (VECTOR_ELT_ORDER_BIG)
> > + emit_insn (gen_altivec_lvsl_direct (operands[0], operands[1]));
> > + else
> > + {
> > + int i;
> > + rtx mask, perm[16], constv, vperm;
> > + mask = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode);
> > + emit_insn (gen_altivec_lvsl_direct (mask, operands[1]));
> > + for (i = 0; i < 16; ++i)
>
> i++ is the common style.
Now that we're being compiled as C++, ++i is the common style there --
is there guidance about this for gcc style these days?
Thanks,
Bill
>
>
> Segher
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-29 22:26 Bill Schmidt
2014-09-30 14:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-09-30 15:24 ` Bill Schmidt [this message]
2014-09-30 16:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-09-30 16:18 ` Bill Schmidt
2014-09-30 20:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-10-02 19:20 ` Bill Schmidt
2014-10-03 18:18 ` David Edelsohn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412090663.2986.50.camel@gnopaine \
--to=wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).