From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23188 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2014 00:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23169 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2014 00:49:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:49:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9U0nNeb007405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:49:24 -0400 Received: from surprise.redhat.com (vpn-235-224.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.235.224]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9U0nLmR030372; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:49:22 -0400 From: David Malcolm To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jit@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , "Joseph S. Myers" , David Malcolm Subject: [jit] Tweaks to install.texi Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1414629904-4550-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1413919448.9513.250.camel@surprise> References: <1413919448.9513.250.camel@surprise> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg03160.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 15:24 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 18:15 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Monday 2014-10-20 15:19, David Malcolm wrote: > > > +@item Sphinx (any working version) > > > > As opposed to "any non-working version"? ;-) I'd just omit > > "working" from this. > > FWIW, all my development has been with Sphinx 1.1.3, which is from > 2012-03-10. My guess is that it work with earlier versions: looking at > Sphinx's own docs, the most recently-added feature that I'm using is > domains, which is marked as 1.0 or later. > > > Otherwise this looks good to me, except... > > > > > +Necessary to regenerate @file{jit/docs/_build/texinfo} from the .rst > > > +files in the directories below @file{jit/docs}. > > > > ...that it probably should read @file{.rst}? Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit: gcc/ChangeLog.jit: * doc/install.texi (Tools/packages necessary for modifying GCC): Specify that sphinx version 1.0 or later is required. Wrap .rst inside an @file command. --- gcc/ChangeLog.jit | 6 ++++++ gcc/doc/install.texi | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.jit b/gcc/ChangeLog.jit index 1c7f585..613084e 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog.jit +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.jit @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2014-10-29 David Malcolm + + * doc/install.texi (Tools/packages necessary for modifying GCC): + Specify that Sphinx version 1.0 or later is required. Wrap .rst + inside an @file command. + 2014-10-22 David Malcolm * cgraph.h: Drop now-redundant prototype of ipa_cp_c_finalize, diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi index 5add9f6..ef7656c 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/install.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi @@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ Necessary for running @command{texi2dvi} and @command{texi2pdf}, which are used when running @command{make dvi} or @command{make pdf} to create DVI or PDF files, respectively. -@item Sphinx (any working version) +@item Sphinx version 1.0 (or later) -Necessary to regenerate @file{jit/docs/_build/texinfo} from the .rst +Necessary to regenerate @file{jit/docs/_build/texinfo} from the @file{.rst} files in the directories below @file{jit/docs}. @item SVN (any version) -- 1.7.11.7