Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 223098)
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@
-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast -Wno-invalid-offsetof @gol
-Winvalid-pch -Wlarger-than=@var{len} -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations @gol
-Wlogical-op -Wlogical-not-parentheses -Wlong-long @gol
--Wmain -Wmaybe-uninitialized -Wmemset-transposed-args -Wmissing-braces @gol
+-Wmain -Wmaybe-uninitialized -Wmemset-transposed-args @gol
+-Wmisleading-indentation -Wmissing-braces @gol
-Wmissing-field-initializers -Wmissing-include-dirs @gol
-Wno-multichar -Wnonnull -Wnormalized=@r{[}none@r{|}id@r{|}nfc@r{|}nfkc@r{]} @gol
-Wodr -Wno-overflow -Wopenmp-simd @gol
@@ -3766,6 +3767,45 @@
is enabled by default in C++ and is enabled by either @option{-Wall}
or @option{-Wpedantic}.
+@item -Wmisleading-indentation @r{(C and C++ only)}
+@opindex Wmisleading-indentation
+@opindex Wno-misleading-indentation
+Warn when the indentation of the code does not reflect the block structure.
+Specifically, a warning is issued for @code{if}, @code{else}, @code{while}, and
+@code{for} clauses with a guarded statement that does not use braces,
+followed by an unguarded statement with the same indentation.
+
+This warning is disabled by default.
+
+In the following example, the call to ``bar'' is misleadingly indented as
+if it were guarded by the ``if'' conditional.
+
+@smallexample
+ if (some_condition ())
+ foo ();
+ bar (); /* Gotcha: this is not guarded by the "if". */
+@end smallexample
+
+In the case of mixed tabs and spaces, the warning uses the
+@option{-ftabstop=} option to determine if the statements line up
+(defaulting to 8).
+
+The warning is not issued for code involving multiline preprocessor logic
+such as the following example.
+
+@smallexample
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+#if SOME_CONDITION_THAT_DOES_NOT_HOLD
+ if (flagB)
+#endif
+ foo (1);
+@end smallexample
+
+The warning is not issued after a @code{#line} directive, since this
+typically indicates autogenerated code, and no assumptions can be made
+about the layout of the file that the directive references.
+
@item -Wmissing-braces
@opindex Wmissing-braces
@opindex Wno-missing-braces
Index: gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c (revision 223098)
@@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
+/* Implementation of -Wmisleading-indentation
+ Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+This file is part of GCC.
+
+GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
+the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
+Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later
+version.
+
+GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
+WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
+. */
+
+#include "config.h"
+#include "system.h"
+#include "coretypes.h"
+#include "tm.h"
+#include "hash-set.h"
+#include "machmode.h"
+#include "vec.h"
+#include "double-int.h"
+#include "input.h"
+#include "alias.h"
+#include "symtab.h"
+#include "wide-int.h"
+#include "inchash.h"
+#include "tree.h"
+#include "stringpool.h"
+#include "stor-layout.h"
+#include "input.h"
+#include "c-common.h"
+
+extern cpp_options *cpp_opts;
+
+/* Convert libcpp's notion of a column (a 1-based char count) to
+ the "visual column" (0-based column, respecting tabs), by reading the
+ relevant line.
+ Returns true if a conversion was possible, writing the result to OUT,
+ otherwise returns false. */
+
+static bool
+get_visual_column (expanded_location exploc, unsigned int *out)
+{
+ int line_len;
+ const char *line = location_get_source_line (exploc, &line_len);
+ if (!line)
+ return false;
+ unsigned int vis_column = 0;
+ for (int i = 1; i < exploc.column; i++)
+ {
+ unsigned char ch = line[i - 1];
+ if (ch == '\t')
+ {
+ /* Round up to nearest tab stop. */
+ const unsigned int tab_width = cpp_opts->tabstop;
+ vis_column = ((vis_column + tab_width) / tab_width) * tab_width;
+ }
+ else
+ vis_column++;
+ }
+
+ *out = vis_column;
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Is the token at LOC the first non-whitespace on its line?
+ Helper function for should_warn_for_misleading_indentation. */
+
+static bool
+is_first_nonwhitespace_on_line (expanded_location exploc)
+{
+ int line_len;
+ const char *line = location_get_source_line (exploc, &line_len);
+
+ /* If we can't determine it, return false so that we don't issue a
+ warning. This is sometimes the case for input files
+ containing #line directives, and these are often for autogenerated
+ sources (e.g. from .md files), where it's not clear that it's
+ meaningful to look at indentation. */
+ if (!line)
+ return false;
+
+ for (int i = 1; i < exploc.column; i++)
+ {
+ unsigned char ch = line[i - 1];
+ if (!ISSPACE (ch))
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Does the given source line appear to contain a #if directive?
+ (or #ifdef/#ifndef). Ignore the possibility of it being inside a
+ comment, for simplicity.
+ Helper function for detect_preprocessor_logic. */
+
+static bool
+line_contains_hash_if (const char *file, int line_num)
+{
+ expanded_location exploc;
+ exploc.file = file;
+ exploc.line = line_num;
+ exploc.column = 1;
+
+ int line_len;
+ const char *line = location_get_source_line (exploc, &line_len);
+ if (!line)
+ return false;
+
+ int idx;
+
+ /* Skip leading whitespace. */
+ for (idx = 0; idx < line_len; idx++)
+ if (!ISSPACE (line[idx]))
+ break;
+ if (idx == line_len)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Require a '#' character. */
+ if (line[idx] != '#')
+ return false;
+ idx++;
+
+ /* Skip whitespace. */
+ while (idx < line_len)
+ {
+ if (!ISSPACE (line[idx]))
+ break;
+ idx++;
+ }
+
+ /* Match #if/#ifdef/#ifndef. */
+ if (idx + 2 <= line_len)
+ if (line[idx] == 'i')
+ if (line[idx + 1] == 'f')
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/* Determine if there is preprocessor logic between
+ BODY_EXPLOC and NEXT_STMT_EXPLOC, to ensure that we don't
+ issue a warning for cases like this:
+
+ if (flagA)
+ foo ();
+ ^ BODY_EXPLOC
+ #if SOME_CONDITION_THAT_DOES_NOT_HOLD
+ if (flagB)
+ #endif
+ bar ();
+ ^ NEXT_STMT_EXPLOC
+
+ despite "bar ();" being visually aligned below "foo ();" and
+ being (as far as the parser sees) the next token.
+
+ Return true if such logic is detected. */
+
+static bool
+detect_preprocessor_logic (expanded_location body_exploc,
+ expanded_location next_stmt_exploc)
+{
+ gcc_assert (next_stmt_exploc.file == body_exploc.file);
+ gcc_assert (next_stmt_exploc.line > body_exploc.line);
+
+ if (next_stmt_exploc.line - body_exploc.line < 4)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Is there a #if/#ifdef/#ifndef directive somewhere in the lines
+ between the given locations?
+
+ This is something of a layering violation, but by necessity,
+ given the nature of what we're testing for. For example,
+ in theory we could be fooled by a #if within a comment, but
+ it's unlikely to matter. */
+ for (int line = body_exploc.line + 1; line < next_stmt_exploc.line; line++)
+ if (line_contains_hash_if (body_exploc.file, line))
+ return true;
+
+ /* Not found. */
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/* Helper function for warn_for_misleading_indentation; see
+ description of that function below. */
+
+static bool
+should_warn_for_misleading_indentation (location_t guard_loc,
+ location_t body_loc,
+ location_t next_stmt_loc,
+ enum cpp_ttype next_tok_type)
+{
+ /* Don't attempt to compare the indentation of BODY_LOC and NEXT_STMT_LOC
+ if either are within macros. */
+ if (linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p (line_table, body_loc)
+ || linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p (line_table, next_stmt_loc))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Don't attempt to compare indentation if #line or # 44 "file"-style
+ directives are present, suggesting generated code.
+
+ All bets are off if these are present: the file that the #line
+ directive could have an entirely different coding layout to C/C++
+ (e.g. .md files).
+
+ To determine if a #line is present, in theory we could look for a
+ map with reason == LC_RENAME_VERBATIM. However, if there has
+ subsequently been a long line requiring a column number larger than
+ that representable by the original LC_RENAME_VERBATIM map, then
+ we'll have a map with reason LC_RENAME.
+ Rather than attempting to search all of the maps for a
+ LC_RENAME_VERBATIM, instead we have libcpp set a flag whenever one
+ is seen, and we check for the flag here.
+ */
+ if (line_table->seen_line_directive)
+ return false;
+
+ if (next_tok_type == CPP_CLOSE_BRACE)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Don't warn here about spurious semicolons. */
+ if (next_tok_type == CPP_SEMICOLON)
+ return false;
+
+ expanded_location body_exploc
+ = expand_location_to_spelling_point (body_loc);
+ expanded_location next_stmt_exploc
+ = expand_location_to_spelling_point (next_stmt_loc);
+
+ /* They must be in the same file. */
+ if (next_stmt_exploc.file != body_exploc.file)
+ return false;
+
+ /* If NEXT_STMT_LOC and BODY_LOC are on the same line, consider
+ the location of the guard.
+
+ Cases where we want to issue a warning:
+
+ if (flag)
+ foo (); bar ();
+ ^ WARN HERE
+
+ if (flag) foo (); bar ();
+ ^ WARN HERE
+
+ Cases where we don't want to issue a warning:
+
+ various_code (); if (flag) foo (); bar (); more_code ();
+ ^ DON'T WARN HERE. */
+ if (next_stmt_exploc.line == body_exploc.line)
+ {
+ expanded_location guard_exploc
+ = expand_location_to_spelling_point (guard_loc);
+ if (guard_exploc.file != body_exploc.file)
+ return true;
+ if (guard_exploc.line < body_exploc.line)
+ /* The guard is on a line before a line that contains both
+ the body and the next stmt. */
+ return true;
+ else if (guard_exploc.line == body_exploc.line)
+ {
+ /* They're all on the same line. */
+ gcc_assert (guard_exploc.file == next_stmt_exploc.file);
+ gcc_assert (guard_exploc.line == next_stmt_exploc.line);
+ /* Heuristic: only warn if the guard is the first thing
+ on its line. */
+ if (is_first_nonwhitespace_on_line (guard_exploc))
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If NEXT_STMT_LOC is on a line after BODY_LOC, consider
+ their relative locations, and of the guard.
+
+ Cases where we want to issue a warning:
+ if (flag)
+ foo ();
+ bar ();
+ ^ WARN HERE
+
+ Cases where we don't want to issue a warning:
+ if (flag)
+ foo ();
+ bar ();
+ ^ DON'T WARN HERE (autogenerated code?)
+
+ if (flagA)
+ foo ();
+ #if SOME_CONDITION_THAT_DOES_NOT_HOLD
+ if (flagB)
+ #endif
+ bar ();
+ ^ DON'T WARN HERE
+ */
+ if (next_stmt_exploc.line > body_exploc.line)
+ {
+ /* Determine if GUARD_LOC and NEXT_STMT_LOC are aligned on the same
+ "visual column"... */
+ unsigned int next_stmt_vis_column;
+ unsigned int body_vis_column;
+ /* If we can't determine it, don't issue a warning. This is sometimes
+ the case for input files containing #line directives, and these
+ are often for autogenerated sources (e.g. from .md files), where
+ it's not clear that it's meaningful to look at indentation. */
+ if (!get_visual_column (next_stmt_exploc, &next_stmt_vis_column))
+ return false;
+ if (!get_visual_column (body_exploc, &body_vis_column))
+ return false;
+ if (next_stmt_vis_column == body_vis_column)
+ {
+ /* Don't warn if they aren't aligned on the same column
+ as the guard itself (suggesting autogenerated code that
+ doesn't bother indenting at all). */
+ expanded_location guard_exploc
+ = expand_location_to_spelling_point (guard_loc);
+ unsigned int guard_vis_column;
+ if (!get_visual_column (guard_exploc, &guard_vis_column))
+ return false;
+ if (guard_vis_column == body_vis_column)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Don't warn if there is multiline preprocessor logic between
+ the two statements. */
+ if (detect_preprocessor_logic (body_exploc, next_stmt_exploc))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Otherwise, they are visually aligned: issue a warning. */
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Called by the C/C++ frontends when we have a guarding statement at
+ GUARD_LOC containing a statement at BODY_LOC, where the block wasn't
+ written using braces, like this:
+
+ if (flag)
+ foo ();
+
+ along with the location of the next token, at NEXT_STMT_LOC,
+ so that we can detect followup statements that are within
+ the same "visual block" as the guarded statement, but which
+ aren't logically grouped within the guarding statement, such
+ as:
+
+ GUARD_LOC
+ |
+ V
+ if (flag)
+ foo (); <- BODY_LOC
+ bar (); <- NEXT_STMT_LOC
+
+ In the above, "bar ();" isn't guarded by the "if", but
+ is indented to misleadingly suggest that it is in the same
+ block as "foo ();".
+
+ GUARD_KIND identifies the kind of clause e.g. "if", "else" etc. */
+
+void
+warn_for_misleading_indentation (location_t guard_loc,
+ location_t body_loc,
+ location_t next_stmt_loc,
+ enum cpp_ttype next_tok_type,
+ const char *guard_kind)
+{
+ if (should_warn_for_misleading_indentation (guard_loc,
+ body_loc,
+ next_stmt_loc,
+ next_tok_type))
+ if (warning_at (next_stmt_loc, OPT_Wmisleading_indentation,
+ "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..."))
+ inform (guard_loc,
+ "...this %qs clause, but it is not", guard_kind);
+}
Index: gcc/c-family/c.opt
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c.opt (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/c-family/c.opt (revision 223098)
@@ -553,6 +553,10 @@
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_memset_transposed_args) Warning LangEnabledBy(C ObjC C++ ObjC++,Wall)
Warn about suspicious calls to memset where the third argument is constant literal zero and the second is not
+Wmisleading-indentation
+C C++ Common Var(warn_misleading_indentation) Warning
+Warn when the indentation of the code does not reflect the block structure
+
Wmissing-braces
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_missing_braces) Warning LangEnabledBy(C ObjC,Wall)
Warn about possibly missing braces around initializers
Index: gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/c-family/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * c-common.h (warn_for_misleading_indentation): New prototype.
+ * c-indentation.c: New file.
+ * c.opt (Wmisleading-indentation): New option.
+
2015-05-12 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/66010
Index: gcc/c-family/c-common.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.h (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h (revision 223098)
@@ -1429,4 +1429,12 @@
extern tree cilk_for_number_of_iterations (tree);
extern bool check_no_cilk (tree, const char *, const char *,
location_t loc = UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+/* In c-indentation.c. */
+extern void
+warn_for_misleading_indentation (location_t guard_loc,
+ location_t body_loc,
+ location_t next_stmt_loc,
+ enum cpp_ttype next_tok_type,
+ const char *guard_kind);
+
#endif /* ! GCC_C_COMMON_H */
Index: gcc/c/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/c/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/c/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * c-parser.c (c_parser_if_body): Add param "if_loc", use it
+ to add a call to warn_for_misleading_indentation.
+ (c_parser_else_body): Likewise, adding param "else_loc".
+ (c_parser_if_statement): Check for misleading indentation.
+ (c_parser_while_statement): Likewise.
+ (c_parser_for_statement): Likewise.
+
2015-05-08 Marek Polacek
PR c/64918
Index: gcc/c/c-parser.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c/c-parser.c (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/c/c-parser.c (revision 223098)
@@ -5185,7 +5185,7 @@
parser->in_if_block. */
static tree
-c_parser_if_body (c_parser *parser, bool *if_p)
+c_parser_if_body (c_parser *parser, bool *if_p, location_t if_loc)
{
tree block = c_begin_compound_stmt (flag_isoc99);
location_t body_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
@@ -5203,7 +5203,15 @@
else if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
add_stmt (c_parser_compound_statement (parser));
else
- c_parser_statement_after_labels (parser);
+ {
+ c_parser_statement_after_labels (parser);
+ if (!c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_ELSE))
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (if_loc, body_loc,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type,
+ "if");
+ }
+
return c_end_compound_stmt (body_loc, block, flag_isoc99);
}
@@ -5212,9 +5220,9 @@
specially for the sake of -Wempty-body warnings. */
static tree
-c_parser_else_body (c_parser *parser)
+c_parser_else_body (c_parser *parser, location_t else_loc)
{
- location_t else_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
+ location_t body_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
tree block = c_begin_compound_stmt (flag_isoc99);
c_parser_all_labels (parser);
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_SEMICOLON))
@@ -5227,8 +5235,14 @@
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
}
else
- c_parser_statement_after_labels (parser);
- return c_end_compound_stmt (else_loc, block, flag_isoc99);
+ {
+ c_parser_statement_after_labels (parser);
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (else_loc, body_loc,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type,
+ "else");
+ }
+ return c_end_compound_stmt (body_loc, block, flag_isoc99);
}
/* Parse an if statement (C90 6.6.4, C99 6.8.4).
@@ -5250,6 +5264,7 @@
tree if_stmt;
gcc_assert (c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_IF));
+ location_t if_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
block = c_begin_compound_stmt (flag_isoc99);
loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
@@ -5261,12 +5276,13 @@
}
in_if_block = parser->in_if_block;
parser->in_if_block = true;
- first_body = c_parser_if_body (parser, &first_if);
+ first_body = c_parser_if_body (parser, &first_if, if_loc);
parser->in_if_block = in_if_block;
if (c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_ELSE))
{
+ location_t else_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
- second_body = c_parser_else_body (parser);
+ second_body = c_parser_else_body (parser, else_loc);
}
else
second_body = NULL_TREE;
@@ -5346,6 +5362,7 @@
tree block, cond, body, save_break, save_cont;
location_t loc;
gcc_assert (c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_WHILE));
+ location_t while_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
block = c_begin_compound_stmt (flag_isoc99);
loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
@@ -5362,7 +5379,16 @@
c_break_label = NULL_TREE;
save_cont = c_cont_label;
c_cont_label = NULL_TREE;
+
+ location_t body_loc = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
+ if (c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type != CPP_OPEN_BRACE)
+ body_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
body = c_parser_c99_block_statement (parser);
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (while_loc, body_loc,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type,
+ "while");
+
c_finish_loop (loc, cond, NULL, body, c_break_label, c_cont_label, true);
add_stmt (c_end_compound_stmt (loc, block, flag_isoc99));
c_break_label = save_break;
@@ -5640,7 +5666,16 @@
c_break_label = NULL_TREE;
save_cont = c_cont_label;
c_cont_label = NULL_TREE;
+
+ location_t body_loc = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
+ if (c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type != CPP_OPEN_BRACE)
+ body_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
body = c_parser_c99_block_statement (parser);
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (for_loc, body_loc,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location,
+ c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type,
+ "for");
+
if (is_foreach_statement)
objc_finish_foreach_loop (loc, object_expression, collection_expression, body, c_break_label, c_cont_label);
else
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Add -Wmisleading-indentation.
+ (-Wmisleading-indentation): New option.
+ * Makefile.in (C_COMMON_OBJS): Add c-family/c-indentation.o.
+
2015-05-12 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.h (TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT): New define.
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation.c: New testcase.
+ * c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.c: New testcase.
+ * c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.md: New file.
+
2015-05-12 Sandra Loosemore
* gcc.target/nios2/nios2-trap-insn.c: Expect "trap" instead of
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.md (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.md (revision 223098)
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+;; Support file for testcase Wmisleading-indentation.c
+;; Adapted from gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+(define_attr "cpu" "none,pentium,pentiumpro,geode,k6,athlon,k8,core2,nehalem,
+ atom,slm,generic,amdfam10,bdver1,bdver2,bdver3,bdver4,
+ btver2,knl"
+ (const (symbol_ref "ix86_schedule")))
+
+;; A basic instruction type. Refinements due to arguments to be
+;; provided in other attributes.
+(define_attr "type"
+ "other,multi,
+ alu,alu1,negnot,imov,imovx,lea,
+ incdec,ishift,ishiftx,ishift1,rotate,rotatex,rotate1,
+ imul,imulx,idiv,icmp,test,ibr,setcc,icmov,
+ push,pop,call,callv,leave,
+ str,bitmanip,
+ fmov,fop,fsgn,fmul,fdiv,fpspc,fcmov,fcmp,
+ fxch,fistp,fisttp,frndint,
+ sse,ssemov,sseadd,sseadd1,sseiadd,sseiadd1,
+ ssemul,sseimul,ssediv,sselog,sselog1,
+ sseishft,sseishft1,ssecmp,ssecomi,
+ ssecvt,ssecvt1,sseicvt,sseins,
+ sseshuf,sseshuf1,ssemuladd,sse4arg,
+ lwp,mskmov,msklog,
+ mmx,mmxmov,mmxadd,mmxmul,mmxcmp,mmxcvt,mmxshft,
+ mpxmov,mpxmk,mpxchk,mpxld,mpxst"
+ (const_string "other"))
+
+;; Main data type used by the insn
+(define_attr "mode"
+ "unknown,none,QI,HI,SI,DI,TI,OI,XI,SF,DF,XF,TF,V16SF,V8SF,V4DF,V4SF,
+ V2DF,V2SF,V1DF,V8DF"
+ (const_string "unknown"))
+
+;; The CPU unit operations uses.
+(define_attr "unit" "integer,i387,sse,mmx,unknown"
+ (cond [(eq_attr "type" "fmov,fop,fsgn,fmul,fdiv,fpspc,fcmov,fcmp,
+ fxch,fistp,fisttp,frndint")
+ (const_string "i387")
+ (eq_attr "type" "sse,ssemov,sseadd,sseadd1,sseiadd,sseiadd1,
+ ssemul,sseimul,ssediv,sselog,sselog1,
+ sseishft,sseishft1,ssecmp,ssecomi,
+ ssecvt,ssecvt1,sseicvt,sseins,
+ sseshuf,sseshuf1,ssemuladd,sse4arg,mskmov")
+ (const_string "sse")
+ (const_string "integer")))
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation.c (revision 223098)
@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+/* { dg-options "-Wmisleading-indentation -Wall" } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+extern int foo (int);
+extern int bar (int, int);
+extern int flagA;
+extern int flagB;
+extern int flagC;
+extern int flagD;
+
+int
+fn_1 (int flag)
+{
+ int x = 4, y = 5;
+ if (flag) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ x = 3;
+ y = 2; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+ return x * y;
+}
+
+int
+fn_2 (int flag, int x, int y)
+{
+ if (flag) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ x++; y++; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+
+ return x * y;
+}
+
+int
+fn_3 (int flag)
+{
+ int x = 4, y = 5;
+ if (flag)
+ x = 3;
+ else /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'else' clause, but it is not" } */
+ x = 2;
+ y = 2; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+ return x * y;
+}
+
+void
+fn_4 (double *a, double *b, double *c)
+{
+ int i = 0;
+ while (i < 10) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'while' clause, but it is not" } */
+ a[i] = b[i] * c[i];
+ i++; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void
+fn_5 (double *a, double *b, double *sum, double *prod)
+{
+ int i = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) /* { dg-output "3: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not" } */
+ sum[i] = a[i] * b[i];
+ prod[i] = a[i] * b[i]; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+/* Based on CVE-2014-1266 aka "goto fail" */
+int fn_6 (int a, int b, int c)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ /* ... */
+ if ((err = foo (a)) != 0)
+ goto fail;
+ if ((err = foo (b)) != 0) /* { dg-message "2: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ goto fail;
+ goto fail; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+ if ((err = foo (c)) != 0)
+ goto fail;
+ /* ... */
+
+fail:
+ return err;
+}
+
+int fn_7 (int p, int q, int r, int s, int t)
+{
+ if (bar (p, q))
+ {
+ if (p) /* { dg-message "7: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ q++; r++; /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+ t++;
+ }
+ return p + q + r + s + t;
+}
+
+int fn_8 (int a, int b, int c)
+{
+ /* This should *not* be flagged as misleading indentation. */
+ if (a) return b; else return c;
+}
+
+void fn_9 (int flag)
+{
+ if (flag) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_10 (int flag)
+{
+ if (flag) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ if (flag / 2)
+ {
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);
+ }
+ foo (2); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+ foo (3);
+}
+
+void fn_11 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ if (flagB)
+ if (flagC) /* { dg-message "7: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ foo (0);
+ bar (1, 2); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_12 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ if (flagB) /* { dg-message "5: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ if (flagC)
+ foo (0);
+ bar (1, 2); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_13 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ if (flagB)
+ if (flagC)
+ foo (0);
+ bar (1, 2); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+#define FOR_EACH(VAR, START, STOP) \
+ for ((VAR) = (START); (VAR) < (STOP); (VAR++)) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not" } */
+
+void fn_14 (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ FOR_EACH (i, 0, 10) /* { dg-message "3: in expansion of macro" } */
+ foo (i);
+ bar (i, i); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+#undef FOR_EACH
+
+#define FOR_EACH(VAR, START, STOP) for ((VAR) = (START); (VAR) < (STOP); (VAR++)) /* { dg-message "36: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not" } */
+void fn_15 (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ FOR_EACH (i, 0, 10) /* { dg-message "3: in expansion of macro" } */
+ foo (i);
+ bar (i, i); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+#undef FOR_EACH
+
+void fn_16_spaces (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ while (flagA)
+ if (flagB) /* { dg-message "7: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1); /* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_16_tabs (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ while (flagA)
+ if (flagB) /* { dg-message "7: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not" } */
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);/* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_17_spaces (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not" } */
+ while (flagA)
+ if (flagB)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);/* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_17_tabs (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) /* { dg-message "3: ...this 'for' clause, but it is not" } */
+ while (flagA)
+ if (flagB)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);/* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_18_spaces (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ while (flagA) /* { dg-message "5: ...this 'while' clause, but it is not" } */
+ if (flagB)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);/* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+void fn_18_tabs (void)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ while (flagA) /* { dg-message "5: ...this 'while' clause, but it is not" } */
+ if (flagB)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);/* { dg-warning "statement is indented as if it were guarded by..." } */
+}
+
+/* This shouldn't lead to a warning. */
+int fn_19 (void) { if (flagA) return 1; else return 0; }
+
+/* A deeply-nested mixture of spaces and tabs, adapted from
+ c-c++-common/pr60101.c.
+ This should not lead to a warning. */
+void
+fn_20 (unsigned int l)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ unsigned int n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7, n8, n9, n10, n11;
+
+ for (n0 = 0; n0 < l; n0++)
+ for (n1 = 0; n1 < l; n1++)
+ for (n2 = 0; n2 < l; n2++)
+ for (n3 = 0; n3 < l; n3++)
+ for (n4 = 0; n4 < l; n4++)
+ for (n5 = 0; n5 < l; n5++)
+ for (n6 = 0; n6 < l; n6++)
+ for (n7 = 0; n7 < l; n7++)
+ for (n8 = 0; n8 < l; n8++)
+ for (n9 = 0; n9 < l; n9++)
+ for (n10 = 0; n10 < l; n10++)
+ for (n11 = 0; n11 < l; n11++)
+ {
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);
+ }
+ foo (2);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Another nested mix of tabs and spaces that shouldn't lead to a warning,
+ with a preprocessor directive thrown in for good measure
+ (adapted from libgomp/loop.c: gomp_loop_init). */
+void fn_21 (void)
+{
+ foo (0);
+ if (flagA)
+ {
+ foo (1);
+
+#if 1
+ {
+ foo (2);
+ if (flagB)
+ {
+ if (flagC)
+ foo (3);
+ else
+ foo (4);
+ }
+ else if (flagD)
+ foo (5);
+ else
+ foo (6);
+ }
+#endif
+ }
+}
+
+/* The conditionals within the following macros shouldn't be warned about.
+ Adapted from libgomp/driver.c: gomp_load_plugin_for_device. */
+int fn_22 (void)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+#define DLSYM() \
+ do \
+ { \
+ err = foo (0); \
+ if (err) \
+ goto out; \
+ } \
+ while (0)
+#define DLSYM_OPT() \
+ do \
+ { \
+ err = foo (1); \
+ if (err) \
+ foo (2); \
+ else \
+ foo (3); \
+ foo (4); \
+ } \
+ while (0)
+ DLSYM ();
+ DLSYM_OPT ();
+#undef DLSYM
+#undef DLSYM_OPT
+
+ out:
+ return err;
+}
+
+/* This shouldn't be warned about. */
+void fn_23 (void) { foo (0); foo (1); if (flagA) foo (2); foo (3); foo (4); }
+
+/* Code that simply doesn't bother indenting anywhere (e.g. autogenerated
+ code) shouldn't be warned about. */
+void fn_24 (void)
+{
+ foo (0);
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (1);
+ foo (2);
+}
+
+/* Adapted from libiberty/regex.c; an example of a conditional in a
+ macro where the successor statement begins with a macro arg:
+
+ if (num < 0)
+ num = 0;
+ num = num * 10 + c - '0';
+ ^ this successor statement
+
+ and hence "num" has a spelling location at the argument of the
+ macro usage site ("lower_bound"), we want the definition of the
+ parameter ("num") for the indentation comparison to be meaninful.
+
+ This should not generate a misleading indentation warning. */
+
+# define GET_UNSIGNED_NUMBER(num) \
+ { \
+ while (flagA) \
+ { \
+ if (flagB) \
+ { \
+ if (num < 0) \
+ num = 0; \
+ num = num * 10 + c - '0'; \
+ } \
+ } \
+ }
+void fn_25 (int c, int lower_bound, int upper_bound)
+{
+ GET_UNSIGNED_NUMBER (lower_bound);
+}
+#undef GET_UNSIGNED_NUMBER
+
+/* Example adapted from libdecnumber/decNumber.c:decExpOp that shouldn't
+ trigger a warning. */
+void fn_26 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA) {
+ if (flagB) foo (0); }
+ foo (1);
+}
+
+/* Ensure that we don't get confused by mixed tabs and spaces; the line
+ "foo (1);" has leading spaces before a tab, but this should not
+ lead to a warning from -Wmisleading-indentation. */
+void fn_27 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+ foo (1);
+}
+
+/* Example adapted from gcc/cgraph.h:symtab_node::get_availability of
+ a spurious trailing semicolon that shouldn't generate a warning. */
+void fn_28 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+ else
+ foo (1);;
+}
+
+/* However, other kinds of spurious semicolons can be a problem. Sadly
+ we don't yet report for the misleading-indented "foo (1);" in the
+ following, due to the spurious semicolon. */
+void fn_29 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ if (flagB)
+ foo (0);;
+ foo (1);
+}
+
+/* Adapted from usage site of #ifdef HAVE_cc0. This should not lead
+ to a warning from -Wmisleading-indentation. */
+void fn_30 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+#if SOME_CONDITION_THAT_DOES_NOT_HOLD
+ if (flagB)
+#endif
+ foo (1);
+}
+
+/* This shouldn't lead to a warning. */
+void fn_31 (void)
+{
+ if (flagA)
+ foo (0);
+ else if (flagB)
+ foo (1);
+ else if (flagC)
+ foo (2);
+ else
+ foo (3);
+}
Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.c (revision 223098)
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/* { dg-options "-Wmisleading-indentation" } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+/* Based on get_attr_athlon_decode from the generated insn-attrtab.c
+ for x86_64.
+ A #line directive, followed by a very long line to ensure that
+ we're in a fresh line_map.
+
+ This should not generate a misleading indentation warning.
+
+ This needs to be in its own file since -Wmisleading-indentation stops
+ after seeing a #line directive. */
+void fn ()
+{
+ switch (0)
+ {
+#line 6 "../../../../src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wmisleading-indentation-2.md"
+ case 0:
+ if (0)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ case 1:
+ if (0)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /**********************************************************************************************************************************/
+ if (0)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ else if (0)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ else if (0)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ default:
+ return;
+
+ }
+}
Index: gcc/cp/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/cp/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * parser.c (cp_parser_selection_statement): Add location and
+ guard_kind arguments to calls to
+ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement.
+ (cp_parser_iteration_statement): Likewise for calls to
+ cp_parser_already_scoped_statement.
+ (cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement): Add "guard_loc" and
+ "guard_kind" params; use them to warn for misleading
+ indentation.
+ (cp_parser_already_scoped_statement): Likewise.
+
2015-05-11 Jan Hubicka
* class.c (fixup_type_variants): Do not copy TYPE_METHODS
Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 223098)
@@ -2065,9 +2065,9 @@
(cp_parser *);
static tree cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement
- (cp_parser *, bool *);
+ (cp_parser *, bool *, location_t, const char *);
static void cp_parser_already_scoped_statement
- (cp_parser *);
+ (cp_parser *, location_t, const char *);
/* Declarations [gram.dcl.dcl] */
@@ -10174,7 +10174,8 @@
nested_if = false;
}
else
- cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, &nested_if);
+ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, &nested_if,
+ token->location, "if");
parser->in_statement = in_statement;
finish_then_clause (statement);
@@ -10184,7 +10185,8 @@
RID_ELSE))
{
/* Consume the `else' keyword. */
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ location_t else_tok_loc
+ = cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer)->location;
begin_else_clause (statement);
/* Parse the else-clause. */
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON))
@@ -10198,7 +10200,8 @@
cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
}
else
- cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL);
+ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL,
+ else_tok_loc, "else");
finish_else_clause (statement);
@@ -10238,7 +10241,8 @@
in_statement = parser->in_statement;
parser->in_switch_statement_p = true;
parser->in_statement |= IN_SWITCH_STMT;
- cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL);
+ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL,
+ 0, "switch");
parser->in_switch_statement_p = in_switch_statement_p;
parser->in_statement = in_statement;
@@ -10783,6 +10787,7 @@
cp_parser_iteration_statement (cp_parser* parser, bool ivdep)
{
cp_token *token;
+ location_t tok_loc;
enum rid keyword;
tree statement;
unsigned char in_statement;
@@ -10792,6 +10797,8 @@
if (!token)
return error_mark_node;
+ tok_loc = token->location;
+
/* Remember whether or not we are already within an iteration
statement. */
in_statement = parser->in_statement;
@@ -10815,7 +10822,7 @@
cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, RT_CLOSE_PAREN);
/* Parse the dependent statement. */
parser->in_statement = IN_ITERATION_STMT;
- cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (parser);
+ cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (parser, tok_loc, "while");
parser->in_statement = in_statement;
/* We're done with the while-statement. */
finish_while_stmt (statement);
@@ -10830,7 +10837,7 @@
statement = begin_do_stmt ();
/* Parse the body of the do-statement. */
parser->in_statement = IN_ITERATION_STMT;
- cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL);
+ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser, NULL, 0, "do");
parser->in_statement = in_statement;
finish_do_body (statement);
/* Look for the `while' keyword. */
@@ -10860,7 +10867,7 @@
/* Parse the body of the for-statement. */
parser->in_statement = IN_ITERATION_STMT;
- cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (parser);
+ cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (parser, tok_loc, "for");
parser->in_statement = in_statement;
/* We're done with the for-statement. */
@@ -11129,7 +11136,9 @@
Returns the new statement. */
static tree
-cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (cp_parser* parser, bool *if_p)
+cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (cp_parser* parser, bool *if_p,
+ location_t guard_loc,
+ const char *guard_kind)
{
tree statement;
@@ -11152,9 +11161,18 @@
/* Create a compound-statement. */
statement = begin_compound_stmt (0);
/* Parse the dependent-statement. */
+ location_t body_loc = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location;
cp_parser_statement (parser, NULL_TREE, false, if_p);
/* Finish the dummy compound-statement. */
finish_compound_stmt (statement);
+ cp_token *next_tok = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+ if (next_tok->keyword != RID_ELSE)
+ {
+ location_t next_stmt_loc = next_tok->location;
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (guard_loc, body_loc,
+ next_stmt_loc, next_tok->type,
+ guard_kind);
+ }
}
/* Return the statement. */
@@ -11167,11 +11185,20 @@
scope. */
static void
-cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (cp_parser* parser)
+cp_parser_already_scoped_statement (cp_parser* parser, location_t guard_loc,
+ const char *guard_kind)
{
/* If the token is a `{', then we must take special action. */
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is_not (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
- cp_parser_statement (parser, NULL_TREE, false, NULL);
+ {
+ location_t body_loc = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location;
+ cp_parser_statement (parser, NULL_TREE, false, NULL);
+ cp_token *next_tok = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+ location_t next_stmt_loc = next_tok->location;
+ warn_for_misleading_indentation (guard_loc, body_loc,
+ next_stmt_loc, next_tok->type,
+ guard_kind);
+ }
else
{
/* Avoid calling cp_parser_compound_statement, so that we
Index: gcc/Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- gcc/Makefile.in (revision 223097)
+++ gcc/Makefile.in (revision 223098)
@@ -1145,8 +1145,8 @@
# Language-specific object files shared by all C-family front ends.
C_COMMON_OBJS = c-family/c-common.o c-family/c-cppbuiltin.o c-family/c-dump.o \
- c-family/c-format.o c-family/c-gimplify.o c-family/c-lex.o \
- c-family/c-omp.o c-family/c-opts.o c-family/c-pch.o \
+ c-family/c-format.o c-family/c-gimplify.o c-family/c-indentation.o \
+ c-family/c-lex.o c-family/c-omp.o c-family/c-opts.o c-family/c-pch.o \
c-family/c-ppoutput.o c-family/c-pragma.o c-family/c-pretty-print.o \
c-family/c-semantics.o c-family/c-ada-spec.o \
c-family/c-cilkplus.o \
Index: libcpp/directives.c
===================================================================
--- libcpp/directives.c (revision 223097)
+++ libcpp/directives.c (revision 223098)
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@
static void
do_line (cpp_reader *pfile)
{
- const struct line_maps *line_table = pfile->line_table;
+ struct line_maps *line_table = pfile->line_table;
const struct line_map *map = LINEMAPS_LAST_ORDINARY_MAP (line_table);
/* skip_rest_of_line() may cause line table to be realloc()ed so note down
@@ -965,6 +965,7 @@
skip_rest_of_line (pfile);
_cpp_do_file_change (pfile, LC_RENAME_VERBATIM, new_file, new_lineno,
map_sysp);
+ line_table->seen_line_directive = true;
}
/* Interpret the # 44 "file" [flags] notation, which has slightly
@@ -973,7 +974,7 @@
static void
do_linemarker (cpp_reader *pfile)
{
- const struct line_maps *line_table = pfile->line_table;
+ struct line_maps *line_table = pfile->line_table;
const struct line_map *map = LINEMAPS_LAST_ORDINARY_MAP (line_table);
const cpp_token *token;
const char *new_file = ORDINARY_MAP_FILE_NAME (map);
@@ -1052,6 +1053,7 @@
pfile->line_table->highest_location--;
_cpp_do_file_change (pfile, reason, new_file, new_lineno, new_sysp);
+ line_table->seen_line_directive = true;
}
/* Arrange the file_change callback. pfile->line has changed to
Index: libcpp/include/line-map.h
===================================================================
--- libcpp/include/line-map.h (revision 223097)
+++ libcpp/include/line-map.h (revision 223098)
@@ -386,6 +386,9 @@
/* The special location value that is used as spelling location for
built-in tokens. */
source_location builtin_location;
+
+ /* True if we've seen a #line or # 44 "file" directive. */
+ bool seen_line_directive;
};
/* Returns the pointer to the memory region where information about
Index: libcpp/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- libcpp/ChangeLog (revision 223097)
+++ libcpp/ChangeLog (revision 223098)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2015-05-12 David Malcolm
+
+ * directives.c (do_line): Set seen_line_directive on line_table.
+ (do_linemarker): Likewise.
+ * include/line-map.h (struct line_maps): Add new field
+ "seen_line_directive".
+
2015-05-08 Jason Merrill
* include/cpplib.h: Add CPP_W_CXX11_COMPAT.