* [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
@ 2015-05-20 18:40 Alex Velenko
2015-05-20 20:30 ` Joseph Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Velenko @ 2015-05-20 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: ramana.radhakrishnan
Hi,
This patch limits testcase split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c runs to
supported achitecture versions.
Object size with -march=armv4t check fails because pop pc is not interworking
safe on armv4t.
This test is not supported for -march=armv7 as this test is for thumb1.
Is patch ok?
gcc/testsuite
2015-05-20 Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
* gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c (dg-skip-if):
Skip armv4t, armv7-a and later.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
index e36000b..c649bc1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
/* { dg-do assemble } */
/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os -fdump-rtl-ira " } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { arm_arch_v4t_ok } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { arm_arch_v7a_ok } } */
int foo (char *, char *, int);
int test (int d, char * out, char *in, int len)
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
2015-05-20 18:40 [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase Alex Velenko
@ 2015-05-20 20:30 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-22 16:57 ` Alex Velenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2015-05-20 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Velenko; +Cc: gcc-patches, ramana.radhakrishnan
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch limits testcase split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c runs to
> supported achitecture versions.
> Object size with -march=armv4t check fails because pop pc is not interworking
> safe on armv4t.
> This test is not supported for -march=armv7 as this test is for thumb1.
>
> Is patch ok?
Again, the condition you propose to add doesn't make sense. arm_arch_X_ok
is only appropriate for tests using an explicit -march=X. Testing with
-march=armv7* should automatically skip this test anyway because it would
cause arm_thumb1_ok to fail.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
2015-05-20 20:30 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2015-06-22 16:57 ` Alex Velenko
2015-06-22 17:00 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-25 13:37 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Velenko @ 2015-06-22 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Myers; +Cc: gcc-patches, ramana.radhakrishnan
On 20/05/15 21:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Again, the condition you propose to add doesn't make sense. arm_arch_X_ok
> is only appropriate for tests using an explicit -march=X. Testing with
> -march=armv7* should automatically skip this test anyway because it would
> cause arm_thumb1_ok to fail.
>
Hi,
I adjusted the patch to skip execution split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
with explicitly specified -march=armv4t and provide -march=armv5t flag =
for
arm_arch_v5t_ok targets.
Is patch ok?
Alex
gcc/testsuite
2015-06-22 Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
* gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c (dg-skip-if):
Skip -march=armv4t.
(dg-additional-options): Set armv5t flag.
diff --git
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
index e36000b..3cb93dc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
/* { dg-do assemble } */
/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os -fdump-rtl-ira " } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not test on armv4t" { *-*-* } { "-march=armv4t" } } =
*/
+/* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv5t" {target arm_arch_v5t_ok} } */
int foo (char *, char *, int);
int test (int d, char * out, char *in, int len)
--------------1.8.1.2--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
2015-06-22 16:57 ` Alex Velenko
@ 2015-06-22 17:00 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-25 13:37 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2015-06-22 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Velenko; +Cc: gcc-patches, ramana.radhakrishnan
I have no more comments on this patch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
2015-06-22 16:57 ` Alex Velenko
2015-06-22 17:00 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2015-06-25 13:37 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-07-21 11:53 ` Alex Velenko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan @ 2015-06-25 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Velenko; +Cc: Joseph Myers, gcc-patches, Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com> wrote:
> On 20/05/15 21:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>
>> Again, the condition you propose to add doesn't make sense. arm_arch_X_ok
>> is only appropriate for tests using an explicit -march=X. Testing with
>> -march=armv7* should automatically skip this test anyway because it would
>> cause arm_thumb1_ok to fail.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I adjusted the patch to skip execution split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
> with explicitly specified -march=armv4t and provide -march=armv5t flag =
> for
> arm_arch_v5t_ok targets.
>
> Is patch ok?
>
> Alex
>
> gcc/testsuite
>
> 2015-06-22 Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
>
> * gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c (dg-skip-if):
> Skip -march=armv4t.
> (dg-additional-options): Set armv5t flag.
>
> diff --git
> a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
> index e36000b..3cb93dc 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> /* { dg-do assemble } */
> /* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os -fdump-rtl-ira " } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not test on armv4t" { *-*-* } { "-march=armv4t" } } =
> */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv5t" {target arm_arch_v5t_ok} } */
>
> int foo (char *, char *, int);
> int test (int d, char * out, char *in, int len)
OK - please watch out for any multilibs fallout and apply this.
Ramana
>
> --------------1.8.1.2--
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase.
2015-06-25 13:37 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
@ 2015-07-21 11:53 ` Alex Velenko
2015-07-22 8:10 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Velenko @ 2015-07-21 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ramrad01; +Cc: Joseph Myers, gcc-patches, Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 25/06/15 14:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 20/05/15 21:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>>
>>> Again, the condition you propose to add doesn't make sense. arm_arch_X_ok
>>> is only appropriate for tests using an explicit -march=X. Testing with
>>> -march=armv7* should automatically skip this test anyway because it would
>>> cause arm_thumb1_ok to fail.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I adjusted the patch to skip execution split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
>> with explicitly specified -march=armv4t and provide -march=armv5t flag =
>> for
>> arm_arch_v5t_ok targets.
>>
>> Is patch ok?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> gcc/testsuite
>>
>> 2015-06-22 Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
>>
>> * gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c (dg-skip-if):
>> Skip -march=armv4t.
>> (dg-additional-options): Set armv5t flag.
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
>> index e36000b..3cb93dc 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>> /* { dg-do assemble } */
>> /* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os -fdump-rtl-ira " } */
>> /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not test on armv4t" { *-*-* } { "-march=armv4t" } } =
>> */
>> +/* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv5t" {target arm_arch_v5t_ok} } */
>>
>> int foo (char *, char *, int);
>> int test (int d, char * out, char *in, int len)
>
>
> OK - please watch out for any multilibs fallout and apply this.
>
> Ramana
>>
>> --------------1.8.1.2--
>>
>
Committed to trunk r226036.
Is patch ok for fsf-5?
kind regards,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-22 7:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-20 18:40 [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c testcase Alex Velenko
2015-05-20 20:30 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-22 16:57 ` Alex Velenko
2015-06-22 17:00 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-25 13:37 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-07-21 11:53 ` Alex Velenko
2015-07-22 8:10 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).