* [PATCH 4/4] C: add fixit hint to misspelled field names
2015-12-18 21:47 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition" David Malcolm
@ 2015-12-18 21:47 ` David Malcolm
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Malcolm @ 2015-12-18 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: David Malcolm
Similar to the C++ case in the previous patch, but more involved as
the location of the pertinent token isn't readily available; the patch
adds it as a param to build_component_ref. All callers are updated to
provide the info, apart from objc_build_component_ref; fixing the latter
would lead to a cascade of other changes, so it's simplest to provide
UNKNOWN_LOCATION there and have build_component_ref fall back gracefully
for this case to the old behavior of showing a hint in the message,
without a fixit replacement in the source view.
This does slightly change the location of the error; before we had:
test.c:11:13: error: 'union u' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~
with the patch we have:
test.c:11:15: error: 'union u' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~~~~~
color
I think the location change is an improvement.
I don't know if I can argue that this is a bug fix, but it's a
user-visible improvement, low risk, and a (distantly-related) version
of it was posted in September:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00747.html
Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu;
adds new 3 PASS results to gcc.sum.
OK for trunk in stage 3?
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
* c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_expression): In __builtin_offsetof
and structure element reference, capture the location of the
element name token and pass it to build_component_ref.
(c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary): Likewise for
structure element dereference.
(c_parser_omp_variable_list): Likewise for
OMP_CLAUSE_{_CACHE, MAP, FROM, TO},
* c-tree.h (build_component_ref): Add location_t param.
* c-typeck.c (build_component_ref): Add location_t param
COMPONENT_LOC. Use it, if available, when issuing hints about
mispelled member names to provide a fixit replacement hint.
gcc/objc/ChangeLog:
* objc-act.c (objc_build_component_ref): Update call
to build_component_ref for added param, passing UNKNOWN_LOCATION.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c: New test case.
---
gcc/c/c-parser.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
gcc/c/c-tree.h | 2 +-
gcc/c/c-typeck.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++----
gcc/objc/objc-act.c | 3 ++-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
index 124c30b..774354a 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
@@ -7543,8 +7543,9 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression (c_parser *parser)
accept sub structure and sub array references. */
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME))
{
+ c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
offsetof_ref = build_component_ref
- (loc, offsetof_ref, c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value);
+ (loc, offsetof_ref, comp_tok->value, comp_tok->location);
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
while (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_DOT)
|| c_parser_next_token_is (parser,
@@ -7570,9 +7571,10 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression (c_parser *parser)
c_parser_error (parser, "expected identifier");
break;
}
+ c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
offsetof_ref = build_component_ref
- (loc, offsetof_ref,
- c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value);
+ (loc, offsetof_ref, comp_tok->value,
+ comp_tok->location);
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
}
else
@@ -8046,7 +8048,7 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser *parser,
{
struct c_expr orig_expr;
tree ident, idx;
- location_t sizeof_arg_loc[3];
+ location_t sizeof_arg_loc[3], comp_loc;
tree sizeof_arg[3];
unsigned int literal_zero_mask;
unsigned int i;
@@ -8163,7 +8165,11 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser *parser,
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
expr = default_function_array_conversion (expr_loc, expr);
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME))
- ident = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value;
+ {
+ c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
+ ident = comp_tok->value;
+ comp_loc = comp_tok->location;
+ }
else
{
c_parser_error (parser, "expected identifier");
@@ -8175,7 +8181,8 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser *parser,
start = expr.get_start ();
finish = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->get_finish ();
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
- expr.value = build_component_ref (op_loc, expr.value, ident);
+ expr.value = build_component_ref (op_loc, expr.value, ident,
+ comp_loc);
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
@@ -8195,7 +8202,11 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser *parser,
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
expr = convert_lvalue_to_rvalue (expr_loc, expr, true, false);
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME))
- ident = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value;
+ {
+ c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
+ ident = comp_tok->value;
+ comp_loc = comp_tok->location;
+ }
else
{
c_parser_error (parser, "expected identifier");
@@ -8211,7 +8222,7 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser *parser,
build_indirect_ref (op_loc,
expr.value,
RO_ARROW),
- ident);
+ ident, comp_loc);
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
@@ -10457,9 +10468,12 @@ c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *parser,
t = error_mark_node;
break;
}
- tree ident = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value;
+
+ c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
+ tree ident = comp_tok->value;
+ location_t comp_loc = comp_tok->location;
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
- t = build_component_ref (op_loc, t, ident);
+ t = build_component_ref (op_loc, t, ident, comp_loc);
}
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND:
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-tree.h b/gcc/c/c-tree.h
index 00e72b1..4ca7a31 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/c/c-tree.h
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ extern struct c_expr convert_lvalue_to_rvalue (location_t, struct c_expr,
bool, bool);
extern void mark_exp_read (tree);
extern tree composite_type (tree, tree);
-extern tree build_component_ref (location_t, tree, tree);
+extern tree build_component_ref (location_t, tree, tree, location_t);
extern tree build_array_ref (location_t, tree, tree);
extern tree build_external_ref (location_t, tree, int, tree *);
extern void pop_maybe_used (bool);
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
index 9d6c604..b4bda5b 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
@@ -2306,10 +2306,12 @@ should_suggest_deref_p (tree datum_type)
/* Make an expression to refer to the COMPONENT field of structure or
union value DATUM. COMPONENT is an IDENTIFIER_NODE. LOC is the
- location of the COMPONENT_REF. */
+ location of the COMPONENT_REF. COMPONENT_LOC is the location
+ of COMPONENT. */
tree
-build_component_ref (location_t loc, tree datum, tree component)
+build_component_ref (location_t loc, tree datum, tree component,
+ location_t component_loc)
{
tree type = TREE_TYPE (datum);
enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (type);
@@ -2341,8 +2343,24 @@ build_component_ref (location_t loc, tree datum, tree component)
{
tree guessed_id = lookup_field_fuzzy (type, component);
if (guessed_id)
- error_at (loc, "%qT has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
- type, component, guessed_id);
+ {
+ /* Attempt to provide a fixit replacement hint, if
+ we have a valid range for the component. */
+ location_t reported_loc
+ = (component_loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION) ? component_loc : loc;
+ rich_location rich_loc (line_table, reported_loc);
+ if (component_loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
+ {
+ source_range component_range =
+ get_range_from_loc (line_table, component_loc);
+ rich_loc.add_fixit_replace (component_range,
+ IDENTIFIER_POINTER (guessed_id));
+ }
+ error_at_rich_loc
+ (&rich_loc,
+ "%qT has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
+ type, component, guessed_id);
+ }
else
error_at (loc, "%qT has no member named %qE", type, component);
return error_mark_node;
diff --git a/gcc/objc/objc-act.c b/gcc/objc/objc-act.c
index e09093c..a2f1c45 100644
--- a/gcc/objc/objc-act.c
+++ b/gcc/objc/objc-act.c
@@ -2654,7 +2654,8 @@ objc_build_component_ref (tree datum, tree component)
return finish_class_member_access_expr (datum, component, false,
tf_warning_or_error);
#else
- return build_component_ref (input_location, datum, component);
+ return build_component_ref (input_location, datum, component,
+ UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
#endif
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6ebff1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" } */
+
+union u
+{
+ int color;
+ int shape;
+};
+
+int test (union u *ptr)
+{
+ return ptr->colour; /* { dg-error "did you mean .color.?" } */
+}
+
+/* Verify that we get an underline and a fixit hint. */
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ return ptr->colour;
+ ^~~~~~
+ color
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
--
1.8.5.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization
@ 2015-12-18 21:47 David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names David Malcolm
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Malcolm @ 2015-12-18 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: David Malcolm
The following patch adds a fix-it insertion hint for missing
"template <> " in explicit specializations.
This is more of an enhancement than a bug fix (PR 62314 is more of a
catch-all for adding fix-its), but it's low-risk and a user-visible
improvement, and this specific example is called out as a benefit
of clang over gcc in:
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
I note that clang suggests inserting
template<>
whereas our diagnostic talks about
template <>
hence I have the fixit suggest inserting that. Should we change our
wording instead, and lose the space?
Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu;
adds 9 new PASS results to g++.sum.
OK for trunk in stage 3?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_head): Capture the start location;
use it to emit a fix-it insertion hint when complaining
about missing "template <> " in explicit specializations.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* g++.dg/pr62314.C: New test case.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index a420cf1..2a688b2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -21502,6 +21502,8 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
if (class_key == none_type)
return error_mark_node;
+ location_t class_head_start_location = input_location;
+
/* Parse the attributes. */
attributes = cp_parser_attributes_opt (parser);
@@ -21718,8 +21720,20 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
&& parser->num_template_parameter_lists == 0
&& template_id_p)
{
- error_at (type_start_token->location,
- "an explicit specialization must be preceded by %<template <>%>");
+ /* Build a location of this form:
+ struct typename <ARGS>
+ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ with caret==start at the start token, and
+ finishing at the end of the type. */
+ location_t reported_loc
+ = make_location (class_head_start_location,
+ class_head_start_location,
+ get_finish (type_start_token->location));
+ rich_location richloc (line_table, reported_loc);
+ richloc.add_fixit_insert (class_head_start_location, "template <> ");
+ error_at_rich_loc
+ (&richloc,
+ "an explicit specialization must be preceded by %<template <>%>");
invalid_explicit_specialization_p = true;
/* Take the same action that would have been taken by
cp_parser_explicit_specialization. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ebe75ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+
+template <typename T>
+struct iterator_traits {};
+
+struct file_iterator;
+
+struct iterator_traits<file_iterator> { // { dg-error "explicit specialization must be preceded by .template" }
+};
+
+/* Verify that we emit a fixit hint for this case. */
+
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ struct iterator_traits<file_iterator>
+ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ template <>
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
--
1.8.5.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names
2015-12-18 21:47 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
@ 2015-12-18 21:47 ` David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition" David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] C: add fixit hint to misspelled field names David Malcolm
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Malcolm @ 2015-12-18 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: David Malcolm
When we emit a hint about a misspelled member name, it will slightly
aid readability if we use a fixit-hint to show the proposed
name in context within the source code (and in the future this
might support some kind of auto-apply in an IDE).
This patch adds such a hint to the C++ frontend, taking us from:
test.cc:10:15: error: 'struct foo' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~~~~~
to:
test.cc:10:15: error: 'struct foo' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~~~~~
color
More of an enhancement than a bug fix (PR 62314 is more of a
catch-all for adding fix-its), but it's low-risk and a user-visible
improvement; a version of this was posted in the September patch
kit FWIW, for the C frontend at least:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00747.html
Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu;
adds 9 new PASS results to g++.sum.
OK for trunk in stage 3?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* typeck.c (finish_class_member_access_expr): When
giving a hint about a possibly-misspelled member name,
add a fix-it replacement hint.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C: New test case.
---
gcc/cp/typeck.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 39c1af2..ac0f4ca 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -2799,9 +2799,21 @@ finish_class_member_access_expr (cp_expr object, tree name, bool template_p,
tree guessed_id = lookup_member_fuzzy (access_path, name,
/*want_type=*/false);
if (guessed_id)
- error ("%q#T has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
- TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
- ? TREE_TYPE (access_path) : object_type, name, guessed_id);
+ {
+ location_t bogus_component_loc = input_location;
+ rich_location rich_loc (line_table, bogus_component_loc);
+ source_range bogus_component_range =
+ get_range_from_loc (line_table, bogus_component_loc);
+ rich_loc.add_fixit_replace
+ (bogus_component_range,
+ IDENTIFIER_POINTER (guessed_id));
+ error_at_rich_loc
+ (&rich_loc,
+ "%q#T has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
+ TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
+ ? TREE_TYPE (access_path) : object_type, name,
+ guessed_id);
+ }
else
error ("%q#T has no member named %qE",
TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb10b44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+
+union u
+{
+ int color;
+ int shape;
+};
+
+int test (union u *ptr)
+{
+ return ptr->colour; // { dg-error "did you mean .color.?" }
+}
+
+// Verify that we get an underline and a fixit hint.
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ return ptr->colour;
+ ^~~~~~
+ color
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
--
1.8.5.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition"
2015-12-18 21:47 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names David Malcolm
@ 2015-12-18 21:47 ` David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] C: add fixit hint to misspelled field names David Malcolm
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Malcolm @ 2015-12-18 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: David Malcolm
Looking over the discussion of missing semicolons in
"Quality of Implementation and Attention to Detail"
within
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
and comparing with
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ClangDiagnosticsComparison
I noticed that of the cases we do handle [1], there's room for
improvement; we currently emit:
test.c:2:11: error: expected ';' after struct definition
struct a {}
^
whereas clang reportedly emits:
test.c:2:12: error: expected ';' after struct
struct a {}
^
;
(note the offset of the location, and the fix-it hint)
The following patch gives us the latter, more readable output.
Arguably not a bug fix (PR 62314 is more of a catch-all
for adding fix-its), but it's low-risk and a user-visible
improvement.
Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu;
adds 15 new PASS results to g++.sum.
OK for trunk in stage 3?
[1] I've also filed PR c++/68970 about a case given on the clang
page that we still don't handle.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_specifier_1): When reporting
missing semicolons, use a fixit-hint to suggest insertion
of a semicolon immediately after the closing brace,
offsetting the reported column accordingly.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C: Update column
number of missing semicolon error.
* g++.dg/pr62314-2.C: New test case.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314-2.C | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314-2.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 2a688b2..c7b0aec 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -21287,17 +21287,30 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier_1 (cp_parser* parser)
closing brace. */
if (closing_brace && TYPE_P (type) && want_semicolon)
{
+ /* Locate the closing brace. */
cp_token_position prev
= cp_lexer_previous_token_position (parser->lexer);
cp_token *prev_token = cp_lexer_token_at (parser->lexer, prev);
location_t loc = prev_token->location;
+ /* We want to suggest insertion of a ';' immediately *after* the
+ closing brace, so, if we can, offset the location by 1 column. */
+ location_t next_loc = loc;
+ if (!linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p (line_table, loc))
+ next_loc = linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset (line_table, loc, 1);
+
+ rich_location richloc (line_table, next_loc);
+ richloc.add_fixit_insert (next_loc, ";");
+
if (CLASSTYPE_DECLARED_CLASS (type))
- error_at (loc, "expected %<;%> after class definition");
+ error_at_rich_loc (&richloc,
+ "expected %<;%> after class definition");
else if (TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE)
- error_at (loc, "expected %<;%> after struct definition");
+ error_at_rich_loc (&richloc,
+ "expected %<;%> after struct definition");
else if (TREE_CODE (type) == UNION_TYPE)
- error_at (loc, "expected %<;%> after union definition");
+ error_at_rich_loc (&richloc,
+ "expected %<;%> after union definition");
else
gcc_unreachable ();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C
index eb1f9c7..d14a476 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error5.C
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ class Foo { int foo() return 0; } };
// need make cp_parser_error() report more accurate column numbers.
// { dg-error "30:expected '\{' at end of input" "brace" { target *-*-* } 4 }
-// { dg-error "33:expected ';' after class definition" "semicolon" {target *-*-* } 4 }
+// { dg-error "34:expected ';' after class definition" "semicolon" {target *-*-* } 4 }
// { dg-error "35:expected declaration before '\}' token" "declaration" {target *-*-* } 4 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..deb0cb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr62314-2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+
+template<class T>
+class a {} // { dg-error "11: expected .;. after class definition" }
+class temp {};
+a<temp> b;
+struct b {
+} // { dg-error "2: expected .;. after struct definition" }
+
+/* Verify that we emit fixit hints. */
+
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ class a {}
+ ^
+ ;
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ }
+ ^
+ ;
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
--
1.8.5.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names
2016-04-28 14:04 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
@ 2016-04-28 14:03 ` David Malcolm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Malcolm @ 2016-04-28 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: David Malcolm
When we emit a hint about a misspelled member name, it will slightly
aid readability if we use a fixit-hint to show the proposed
name in context within the source code (and in the future this
might support some kind of auto-apply in an IDE).
This patch adds such a hint to the C++ frontend, taking us from:
test.cc:10:15: error: 'struct foo' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~~~~~
to:
test.cc:10:15: error: 'struct foo' has no member named 'colour'; did you mean 'color'?
return ptr->colour;
^~~~~~
color
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* typeck.c (finish_class_member_access_expr): When
giving a hint about a possibly-misspelled member name,
add a fix-it replacement hint.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62314
* g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C: New test case.
---
gcc/cp/typeck.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 7e12009..95c777d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -2817,9 +2817,21 @@ finish_class_member_access_expr (cp_expr object, tree name, bool template_p,
tree guessed_id = lookup_member_fuzzy (access_path, name,
/*want_type=*/false);
if (guessed_id)
- error ("%q#T has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
- TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
- ? TREE_TYPE (access_path) : object_type, name, guessed_id);
+ {
+ location_t bogus_component_loc = input_location;
+ rich_location rich_loc (line_table, bogus_component_loc);
+ source_range bogus_component_range =
+ get_range_from_loc (line_table, bogus_component_loc);
+ rich_loc.add_fixit_replace
+ (bogus_component_range,
+ IDENTIFIER_POINTER (guessed_id));
+ error_at_rich_loc
+ (&rich_loc,
+ "%q#T has no member named %qE; did you mean %qE?",
+ TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
+ ? TREE_TYPE (access_path) : object_type, name,
+ guessed_id);
+ }
else
error ("%q#T has no member named %qE",
TREE_CODE (access_path) == TREE_BINFO
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb10b44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/spellcheck-fields-2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+
+union u
+{
+ int color;
+ int shape;
+};
+
+int test (union u *ptr)
+{
+ return ptr->colour; // { dg-error "did you mean .color.?" }
+}
+
+// Verify that we get an underline and a fixit hint.
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ return ptr->colour;
+ ^~~~~~
+ color
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
--
1.8.5.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-28 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-18 21:47 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition" David Malcolm
2015-12-18 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] C: add fixit hint to misspelled field names David Malcolm
2016-04-28 14:04 [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization David Malcolm
2016-04-28 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names David Malcolm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).