From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: outer 'this' leaking into local class [PR106969]
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 12:27:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451dd9f-b54c-a113-250a-80ff2d1d5f2a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230323150055.2694558-1-ppalka@redhat.com>
On 3/23/23 11:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Here when resolving the implicit object for '&wrapped' within the
> local class Foo, we expect to obtain a dummy object of type Foo& since
> there's no 'this' available in this context. And yet at this point
> current_class_ref still corresponds to the outer class Context (and is
> const), which confuses maybe_dummy_object into propagating the cv-quals
> of current_class_ref and returning an object of type const Foo&. Thus
> decltype(&wrapped) wrongly yields const int* instead of int*.
>
> The problem ultimately seems to be that the 'this' from the enclosing
> class appears available for use when parsing the local class, but 'this'
> shouldn't leak across classes like that. This patch fixes this by
> clearing current_class_ptr/ref when parsing a class definition.
>
> After this change, for name-clash11.C in C++98 mode we would now
> complain about an invalid use of 'this' for e.g.
>
> ASSERT (sizeof (this->A) == 16);
>
> due to the way the ASSERT macro is defined using a local class. This
> patch redefines it using a local typedef instead.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> trunk/12?
OK.
> PR c++/106969
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * parser.cc (cp_parser_class_specifier): Clear current_class_ptr
> and current_class_ref when parsing a class definition.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/lookup/this2.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/parser.cc | 13 +++++++++----
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/this2.C | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/this2.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> index a277003ea58..be9c77b415e 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> @@ -26151,6 +26151,11 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
> saved_in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p
> = parser->in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p;
> parser->in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p = false;
> + /* 'this' from an enclosing non-static member function is unvailable. */
> + tree saved_ccp = current_class_ptr;
> + tree saved_ccr = current_class_ref;
> + current_class_ptr = NULL_TREE;
> + current_class_ref = NULL_TREE;
>
> /* Start the class. */
> if (nested_name_specifier_p)
> @@ -26369,8 +26374,6 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
> /* If there are noexcept-specifiers that have not yet been processed,
> take care of them now. Do this before processing NSDMIs as they
> may depend on noexcept-specifiers already having been processed. */
> - tree save_ccp = current_class_ptr;
> - tree save_ccr = current_class_ref;
> FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (unparsed_noexcepts, ix, decl)
> {
> tree ctx = DECL_CONTEXT (decl);
> @@ -26496,8 +26499,8 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
> }
> vec_safe_truncate (unparsed_contracts, 0);
>
> - current_class_ptr = save_ccp;
> - current_class_ref = save_ccr;
> + current_class_ptr = NULL_TREE;
> + current_class_ref = NULL_TREE;
> if (pushed_scope)
> pop_scope (pushed_scope);
>
> @@ -26529,6 +26532,8 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
> = saved_num_template_parameter_lists;
> parser->in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p
> = saved_in_unbraced_linkage_specification_p;
> + current_class_ptr = saved_ccp;
> + current_class_ref = saved_ccr;
>
> return type;
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C
> index bc63645e8d3..2ae9a65264d 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash11.C
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> # define ASSERT(e) static_assert (e, #e)
> #else
> # define ASSERT(e) \
> - do { struct S { bool: !!(e); } asrt; (void)&asrt; } while (0)
> + do { typedef int asrt[bool(e) ? 1 : -1]; } while (0)
> #endif
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/this2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/this2.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..1450c563d92
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/this2.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +// PR c++/106969
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +struct Context
> +{
> + void
> + action() const
> + {
> + struct Foo
> + {
> + int wrapped;
> + decltype( &wrapped ) get() { return &wrapped; }
> + } t;
> +
> + *t.get()= 42; // OK, get() returns int* not const int*
> +
> + struct Bar
> + {
> + using type = decltype(this); // { dg-error "invalid use of 'this'" }
> + };
> + }
> +};
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 15:00 Patrick Palka
2023-03-24 16:27 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451dd9f-b54c-a113-250a-80ff2d1d5f2a@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).