From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58520 invoked by alias); 4 May 2016 21:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58511 invoked by uid 89); 4 May 2016 21:25:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=readme.source, UD:source, readmesource, README.source X-HELO: mail-lf0-f65.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f65.google.com) (209.85.215.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 May 2016 21:25:26 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id p64so8324627lfg.0 for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6+iefKN08dUGkVldWbjdToXxhnhLetu/RJkPo/Qyo8=; b=i7U0e6dONS44DyEHemJSGL+FKvjqKG32mpURSxWGWkWwo6SxkCifI8di22n9ZM3XFv i5YNa87Aqubn7wh2xCPDVOEWB/PxdIL3ge0FVEhQsfsQNKK29AyJOgnrR9ahCkkcP/p2 4akUhfAM9xD9g6j4FAj5YG7EClCtn5ixml2/YMaZySz7oCygclmpowGtKSgUjY1UuRYU JPNRqH88gmM1xMAXgwwhJTuu49XpgtOldM1E4hfLLc78QKA/kRiMUoueEVb70PH84X2j GLUSRHOYaSeZIn2QMLSA6+vGVyWOp6ElUJHYtdcsotOO16bSD0o4SKiYENuBwOzAaqYi no+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXNL3zM4NmmmZVkymCh5Ex7NM/RwZJquR94/O6UyQ0XI9oNujia/7yNvZjX8YtoCw== X-Received: by 10.112.227.71 with SMTP id ry7mr4984264lbc.78.1462397123556; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from z97-4790k.lan (81-227-159-95-no235.tbcn.telia.com. [81.227.159.95]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q191sm943697lfd.22.2016.05.04.14.25.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 May 2016 14:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1462397128.2897.67.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Please include ada-hurd.diff upstream (try2) From: Svante Signell Reply-To: svante.signell@gmail.com To: Samuel Thibault Cc: Eric Botcazou , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Arnaud Charlet , Matthias Klose Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 21:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20160504210615.GR3107@var.home> References: <1456875776.5852.194.camel@gmail.com> <20160425095016.GB17357@adacore.com> <1461580096.8664.262.camel@gmail.com> <3112260.f0kR4riLZQ@polaris> <1461744364.8664.335.camel@gmail.com> <20160504152948.GF2861@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20160504153407.GG2861@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <1462380222.2897.39.camel@gmail.com> <1462383807.2897.51.camel@gmail.com> <20160504210615.GR3107@var.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 19:43:27 +0200, wrote: > > May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that > > does > > not unpack the sources, neither does it apply the patches, you have > > to > > unpack and patch before you can change sources and update patches. > > Iv'e > > patched the sources several times and still find that the updated > > patches are not included in the next build. Really confusing. > > Did you read debian/README.source? Now I have read it, but still cannot find a convincing reason for doing things this way, sorry! Matthias, why? There should be very strong arguments for the present procedure.