From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de>
To: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: protected alloca class for malloc fallback
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470742429.639.196.camel@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160808173939.GA13790@ball>
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 13:39 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> First sizeof std::string is 32 on x86_64, a char *, a size_t for the
> length, and a 16 byte union of a size_t for allocated size and a 16
> byte buffer for short strings. I suppose some of this is required by
> the C++ standard,
I recommend checking what others have figured regarding that matter
https://github.com/elliotgoodrich/SSO-23
> but I doubt we really need to care about strings longer than 2^32 in
> gcc. If we put the length and allocated size in the buffer,
> and have a separate class for stack allocated buffers I think we can
> have a string that is just sizeof void *.
This idea has one flaw in that it does not allow having objects by
value. It essentially *requires* one to *always* allocate them on the
heap via new/delete. Being able to store objects by value is useful in
many situations. So if you do the above, the next logical step that
will follow is a smart-pointer-like wrapper that allows value
semantics. Because eventually somebody will want that operator == or
operator < e.g. for associative containers.
>
> Second it would be useful performance wise to have a std::string_view
> type class, but that is c++14 or 17? only so we'd need to import it
> into gcc or something.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/basic_string_view
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string_view
It's "funny" that GCC contains a C++ stdlib implementation and so
little is actually used by GCC itself.
Cheers,
Oleg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 11:30 Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-04 12:58 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-04 15:19 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-04 19:24 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-05 14:37 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-05 15:15 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-05 16:23 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-05 17:48 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-05 8:17 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-04 19:06 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-04 19:16 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-04 19:22 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-04 19:26 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-04 19:31 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-05 2:10 ` Martin Sebor
2016-08-05 14:42 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-05 17:56 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-05 18:16 ` Oleg Endo
2016-08-05 20:07 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-06 10:09 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-06 10:15 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-06 15:08 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-08 17:00 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-08 17:32 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-08-08 19:03 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-09 11:34 ` Oleg Endo [this message]
2016-08-09 17:34 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-08-10 17:03 ` Oleg Endo
2016-08-11 1:23 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-08-11 12:18 ` Oleg Endo
2016-08-11 17:55 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-08-20 2:29 ` Mike Stump
2016-08-21 20:00 ` C++11? (Re: protected alloca class for malloc fallback) Pedro Alves
2016-08-22 7:10 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-08-22 7:28 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-22 12:02 ` Eric Gallager
2016-08-22 12:58 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2016-08-22 22:08 ` Mike Stump
2016-08-23 23:17 ` Eric Gallager
2016-08-09 13:17 ` protected alloca class for malloc fallback Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-09 13:21 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-08-10 10:04 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-10 10:12 ` Aldy Hernandez
2016-08-10 10:39 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-10 18:00 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-10 18:33 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-16 16:28 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-16 16:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-08-16 16:47 ` Jeff Law
2016-08-16 17:54 ` Martin Sebor
2016-08-17 8:27 ` Richard Biener
2016-08-17 13:39 ` Martin Sebor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470742429.639.196.camel@t-online.de \
--to=oleg.endo@t-online.de \
--cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).