From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
To: "Janne Blomqvist" <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>,
"Thomas König" <tk@tkoenig.net>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>,
Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>,
"fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Load scalar intent-in variables at the beginning of procedures
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14e56050-cfd8-f115-ab74-d49f4322754f@net-b.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO9iq9F6-F0nkuFRC+edsA7rN3OTKX20L2k87cwQARy1QHipjA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/20/19 11:18 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> Of course, Fortran language rules specify that the call to bar
>> cannot do anything to n
> Hmm, does it? What about the following modification to your testcase:
This code violates (quote from F2018):
"15.5.2.13Â Restrictions on entities associated with dummy arguments"
"While an entity is associated with a dummy argument, the following
restrictions hold."
"[â¦] (3)  Action that affects the value of the entity or any subobject
of it shall be taken only through the dummy argument unless"
"(a) the dummy argument has the POINTER attribute, [â¦]"
(Some more related to TARGET attribute and to coarrays, which also do
not apply here.)
Not listed there, but the asynchronous attribute (Section 8.5.4) would
be also a way to disable the optimization we are talking about.
Cheers,
Tobias
> module nmod
> integer :: n
> end module nmod
>
> subroutine foo(n,m)
> m = 0
> do 100 i=1,100
> call bar
> m = m + n
> 100 continue
> end subroutine foo
>
> subroutine bar()
> use nmod
> n = 0
> end subroutine bar
>
> program main
> use nmod
> implicit none
> integer :: m
> n = 1
> m = 0
> call foo(n, m)
> print *, m
> end program main
>
>
>> So, a copy in / copy out for variables where we can not be sure that
>> no value is assigned? Does anybody see a downside for that?)
> In principle sounds good, unless my concerns above are real and affect
> this case too.
>
>>> Is there a risk of performance regressions due to higher register pressure?
>> I don't think so. Either the compiler realizes that it can
>> keep the variable in a register (then it makes no difference),
>> or it has to load it fresh from its address (then there is
>> one additional register needed).
> Yes, true. Good point.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 21:57 Thomas König
2019-11-11 22:08 ` Thomas Koenig
2019-11-11 22:53 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-11 23:02 ` Thomas König
2019-11-12 7:48 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-12 12:50 ` Thomas König
2019-11-12 14:33 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-12 17:22 ` Thomas König
2019-11-15 7:41 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-15 18:07 ` Thomas König
2019-11-16 20:42 ` Thomas Koenig
2019-11-19 10:46 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2019-11-19 23:04 ` Thomas Koenig
2019-11-20 18:00 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2019-11-20 20:45 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-20 21:07 ` Steve Kargl
2019-11-20 21:35 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2019-11-20 20:46 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-20 21:39 ` Thomas König
2019-11-20 22:19 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-20 22:32 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-21 9:35 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-20 22:37 ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2019-11-20 22:41 ` Thomas König
2019-11-20 22:30 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-21 9:41 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-21 12:30 ` Richard Biener
2019-11-21 13:17 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-21 13:37 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-21 14:10 ` Richard Biener
2019-11-21 14:39 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-22 10:44 ` Tobias Burnus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14e56050-cfd8-f115-ab74-d49f4322754f@net-b.de \
--to=burnus@net-b.de \
--cc=blomqvist.janne@gmail.com \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=tk@tkoenig.net \
--cc=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
--cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).