From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch][aarch64] Use IFUNCs to enable LSE instructions in libatomic on aarch64
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512435095.14842.17.camel@cavium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511914363.10128.39.camel@cavium.com>
FYI: Since James approved the Aarch64 part and since I think the
generic part can be considered trivial, I have gone ahead and checked
this patch in.
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 16:12 -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 17:35 +0000, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I understood this, and my
> > opinion is
> > that the AArch64 parts of this patch are OK (and I don't know who
> > needs to
> > Ack the small generic changes you require).
> >
> > Let's give Richard/Marcus 48 hours to object while we wait for an
> > OK on the
> > generic bits, and then OK for AArch64.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > Reviewed-By: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
> James, I haven't seen anything from Richard or Marcus. Â Do you think
> a
> review from a global maintainer is really needed? Â There is no
> libatomic specific maintainer. Â The only non-aarch64 specific change
> is using the macro IFUNC_RESOLVER_ARGS in place of the hardcoded
> 'void'
> argument for ifunc selector functions and for all non-aarch64
> platforms
> the macro will be defined as 'void' so there is no real change for
> any
> other platform.
>
> Steve Ellcey
> sellcey@cavium.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 20:44 Steve Ellcey
2017-08-07 20:46 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-08-25 4:56 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-08-25 16:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-08-28 18:40 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-08-29 11:42 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-08-30 18:39 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-08-31 18:55 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-09-27 20:35 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-09-28 11:31 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-09-29 20:29 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-10-02 14:38 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-03 18:57 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-10-24 18:17 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-11-20 18:27 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-11-20 18:29 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-11-20 19:50 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-11-21 17:36 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-11-29 8:09 ` Steve Ellcey
2017-12-05 0:51 ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2017-12-07 9:56 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-12-07 15:58 ` Steve Ellcey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1512435095.14842.17.camel@cavium.com \
--to=sellcey@cavium.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).