public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"james.greenhalgh" <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>,
	 Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
	Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch][aarch64][PR target/83335] Fix regression, ICE on gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 00:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518825893.6296.12.camel@cavium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f16c4b72-b568-6670-6b46-82af8a47b061@arm.com>

On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 14:01 +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to call output_operand_lossage() with a suitable
> diagnostic message?  If the operand isn't in Pmode assembly will
> (should) fail anyway.
> 
> R.

How about this patch?  In addtion to the code change I updated asm-2.c
with the error message that you getin ILP32 mode and I added asm-4.c
which does not give an error message in either LP64 or ILP32 mode.

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com

2018-02-16  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@cavium.com>

	PR target/83335
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print_address_internal):
	Change gcc_assert call to output_operand_lossage.

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 7c9c6e5..34b75f8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -7044,7 +7044,8 @@ aarch64_print_address_internal (FILE *f, machine_mode mode, rtx x,
   unsigned int size;
 
   /* Check all addresses are Pmode - including ILP32.  */
-  gcc_assert (GET_MODE (x) == Pmode);
+  if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+    output_operand_lossage ("invalid address mode");
 
   if (aarch64_classify_address (&addr, x, mode, true, type))
     switch (addr.type)


2018-02-16  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@cavium.com>

	PR target/83335
	* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c: Add dg-error for
	ILP32 mode.
	* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-4.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c
index 3f978f5..65b3a84 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ int x;
 void
 f (void)
 {
-  asm volatile ("%a0" :: "X" (&x));
+  asm volatile ("%a0" :: "X" (&x)); /* { dg-error "invalid address mode" "" { target ilp32 } } */
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-4.c
index e69de29..abe2af5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/asm-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
+
+int x;
+
+void
+f (void)
+{
+  asm volatile ("%a0" :: "X" (__builtin_extend_pointer (&x)));
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-17  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-05 22:14 Steve Ellcey
2018-02-15  9:49 ` AArch64 patch ping Jakub Jelinek
2018-02-15 14:01 ` [Patch][aarch64][PR target/83335] Fix regression, ICE on gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2018-02-17  0:05   ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2018-02-19 15:32     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1518825893.6296.12.camel@cavium.com \
    --to=sellcey@cavium.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).