From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43418 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2018 16:35:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43406 invoked by uid 89); 23 Feb 2018 16:35:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=versus X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:35:50 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1NGZJsW013782 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:35:49 -0500 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gapfgrbyp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:35:48 -0500 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:35:48 -0500 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e18.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.205) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:35:44 -0500 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w1NGZi4Z46268434; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:35:44 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6571112047; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:33:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [9.10.86.107] (unknown [9.10.86.107]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9507E112034; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:33:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Update altivec-7 testcase(s). From: Will Schmidt Reply-To: will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt In-Reply-To: <20180222180616.GG21977@gate.crashing.org> References: <1519234394.11602.370.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com> <20180222180616.GG21977@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:35:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18022316-0044-0000-0000-000003E90F13 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008584; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000254; SDB=6.00993988; UDB=6.00505118; IPR=6.00773328; MB=3.00019709; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-02-23 16:35:46 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18022316-0045-0000-0000-000008191695 Message-Id: <1519403743.31591.3.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-02-23_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1802230205 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 12:06 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi Will, > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:33:14AM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: > > This patch moves the vsx related content from the altivec-7-be test into > > a new vsx-7-be test. > > This fixes up some test failures as seen on older power systems. > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > > +/* { dg-do compile { target powerpc64-*-* } } */ > > powerpc*-*-* please, and if you need 64-bit use lp64. Thats an existing thing to help indicate 'be' versus 'le'. altivec-7-be.c:/* { dg-do compile { target powerpc64-*-* } } */ altivec-7-le.c:/* { dg-do compile { target powerpc64le-*-* } } */ but yeah, we are potentially missing coverage for -m32. Should I instead try to combine the le,be tests, and set target markers on any le/be unique scan-assembler stanzas? > Otherwise fine. Okay for trunk with that fixed. Thanks! > > (Is it useful to copy the altivec stuff here though? The altivec-7-be > test will be run as well). > > > Segher >