From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35697 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2015 12:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35633 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2015 12:14:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:14:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65C133160E2; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:13:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ViziPLowu2eS; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:13:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC1F33160D0; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:13:56 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Botcazou To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [1/2] i386 ROP mitigation: make more of regrename callable Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <15911426.pBo9oThCvb@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/3.16.7-29-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5649C6FC.9090308@redhat.com> References: <5646492C.4070607@t-online.de> <3096223.vUZoc0Wnsh@polaris> <5649C6FC.9090308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg01935.txt.bz2 > Thank you. The 2/2 has a small regrename piece to add target_data > fields, are you OK with that as well? Sure. -- Eric Botcazou