From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36949 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2018 22:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 36937 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2018 22:33:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:33:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B17F81A10; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:33:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wc3J0W7hNo_a; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:33:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35E47814C6; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:33:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: James Greenhalgh Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Sudakshina Das , Jeff Law , nd , Marcus Shawcroft , Richard Earnshaw , Wilco Dijkstra Subject: Re: [PATCH][AARCH64] PR target/84521 Fix frame pointer corruption with -fomit-frame-pointer with __builtin_setjmp Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <16280160.Nx4lr6RsWP@polaris> In-Reply-To: <20180626214437.GA25303@arm.com> References: <4ee92fe8-3070-0129-59ad-40cbe0207822@arm.com> <20180626214437.GA25303@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg01640.txt.bz2 > The AArch64 parts are OK. I've been holding off approving the patch while > I wait for Eric to reply on the x86_64 fails with your new testcase. The test is not portable in any case since it uses the "optimize" attribute so I'd just make it specific to Aarch64 and install the patch. -- Eric Botcazou