From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by alias); 20 May 2016 07:34:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25993 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2016 07:34:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-Envelope-From:sk:ebotcaz, H*F:U*ebotcazou, H*r:sk:polaris, sra X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:34:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BE081330; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7cvjB4EH6jJ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6EC38133C; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:34:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Martin Jambor Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , alan.lawrence@arm.com Subject: Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/70884 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 07:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1654126.nIsqskhxhe@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/3.16.7-35-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160513152403.GL5580@virgil.suse.cz> References: <6226269.FBBDIS7nhY@polaris> <20609673.FxQTIz62nb@polaris> <20160513152403.GL5580@virgil.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01599.txt.bz2 > Effectively, the patch prevents late-SRA from doing anything for both > testcases (PR 70884 and PR 70919). I have started a bootstrap and > testing on x86_64 and i686 only a few moments ago but it would be > great if someone also tried on an architecture for which the > constant-pool SRA enhancement was intended, just to be sure. Can you apply it now? It's a wrong-code regression on the 6 branch and people can still chime it later in any case. -- Eric Botcazou