From: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libphobos: Fix instability in the parallelized testsuite
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1657922526.7xsg40t05n.astroid@pulse.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220714215325.GA18923@ldh-imac.local>
Excerpts from Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches's message of Juli 14, 2022 11:53 pm:
> Hello-
>
> I get a different number of test results from libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp,
> depending on server load. I believe it's because this testsuite doesn't check
> runtest_file_p:
>
> $ make -j 1 RUNTESTFLAGS='unittest.exp' check-target-libphobos | grep '^#'
> # of expected passes 10
>
> $ make -j 2 RUNTESTFLAGS='unittest.exp' check-target-libphobos | grep '^#'
> # of expected passes 10
> # of expected passes 10
>
> $ make -j 4 RUNTESTFLAGS='unittest.exp' check-target-libphobos | grep '^#'
> # of expected passes 10
> # of expected passes 10
> # of expected passes 10
> # of expected passes 10
>
> When running in parallel along with other tests, even at a fixed argument
> for -j, the number of tests that actually execute will depend on how many of the
> parallel sub-makes happened to start prior to the first one finishing, hence
> it changes from run to run.
>
> The attached patch fixes it for me, if it looks OK? Thanks, this would remove
> some noise from before/after test comparisons.
>
> -Lewis
> libphobos: Fix instability in the parallelized testsuite
>
> libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp calls bare dg-test rather than dg-runtest, and
> so it should call runtest_file_p to determine whether to run each test or
> not. Without that call, the tests run too many times in parallel mode (they will
> run as many times, as the argument to make -j).
Hi Lewis,
Thanks! Good spot. I think it should be calling dg-runtest however,
same as what libphobos.cycles/cycles.exp is doing. Could also fix the
test name so each one is unique, just to hit two birds in one -
something like the following would suffice (haven't had time to check).
Kind Regards,
Iain.
---
--- a/libphobos/testsuite/libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp
+++ b/libphobos/testsuite/libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ foreach unit_test $unit_test_list {
set expected_fail [lindex $unit_test 1]
foreach test $tests {
- set shouldfail $expected_fail
- dg-test $test "" $test_flags
+ set libphobos_test_name "[dg-trim-dirname $srcdir $test] $test_flags"
+ set shouldfail $expected_fail
+ dg-runtest $test "" $test_flags
+ set libphobos_test_name ""
}
set shouldfail 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-14 21:53 Lewis Hyatt
2022-07-15 22:07 ` Iain Buclaw [this message]
2022-07-17 15:51 ` Lewis Hyatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1657922526.7xsg40t05n.astroid@pulse.none \
--to=ibuclaw@gdcproject.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=lhyatt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).