From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-120197-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8287 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2004 10:08:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8277 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 10:08:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 10:08:07 -0000
Received: from cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com ([81.96.64.123])
          by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
          id <20040622100641.KLJU8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
          for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:06:41 +0100
Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5MA6pVL013016;
	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:07:01 +0100
Received: (from aph@localhost)
	by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i5MA6oYG013012;
	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:06:50 +0100
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16600.1210.506184.332035@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:16:00 -0000
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
In-Reply-To: <40D7B687.7060903@codesourcery.com>
References: <10406220317.AA03680@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
	<40D7B687.7060903@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01740.txt.bz2

Mark Mitchell writes:
 > Richard Kenner wrote:
 > >
 > >I think everybody agrees on the general overview of what I did and it's
 > >easier to deal with details now that it's checked in.
 > >  
 > >
 > I don't agree.
 > 
 > Please revert this patch until we've got consensus here.

Also, we've got Java regressions.  It seems that something in Kenner's
patch changes the way that expressions are gimplified.  In my opinion,
the Java testsuite should also have been run before this was checked
in.

I don't propose to look at the cause of the Java breakage until there
is a consensus about this patch.

Andrew.