From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20428 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2004 14:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20379 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 14:16:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta07-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.47) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 14:16:18 -0000 Received: from cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com ([81.96.64.123]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040622141353.ZIYJ5696.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:13:53 +0100 Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5MECaVL009229; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:12:46 +0100 Received: (from aph@localhost) by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i5MECZw9009223; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:12:35 +0100 From: Andrew Haley MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16600.15955.211567.688452@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:21:00 -0000 To: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Cc: rmathew@gmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa In-Reply-To: <10406221407.AA06082@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> References: <10406221407.AA06082@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01753.txt.bz2 Richard Kenner writes: > Though I've not been able to fully analyse it, very likely > this is the patch that is causing 2 new FAILs for libjava > on i686-pc-linux-gnu. (If not, I apologise in advance.) > > Could well be. > > The testcase is "libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/err6.java" > and is reproduced here for your reference: > > Could I ask for somebody's help here? I don't even know the Java language, > let alone the Java front end. > > I somebody could point out what tree transformation is going wrong, I'll > be glad to fix it. It seems that something has changed the depth-first, left-to-right parsing of expressions. Have you any idea what might have caused this? Andrew.