From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28227 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2015 21:43:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28212 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2015 21:43:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:43:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5EA2C1E345; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:43:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8wy9xg649LR; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:43:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD7E2C1E339; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:43:20 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Botcazou To: Uros Bizjak Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, ada]: Use xasprintf instead of unchecked asprintf Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1661638.FBqlFqYx3N@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.10-1.29-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 > 2014-12-31 Uros Bizjak > > * gcc-interface/misc.c (internal_error_function): Use xasprintf instead > of unchecked asprintf. > > Although almost trivial, this patch is *not* tested, so I'd kindly ask > someone to bootstrap and regresion test this patch. Sanity checked only, but that's good enough so you can apply it, thanks. -- Eric Botcazou