From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:0:465::202]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276613858D1E for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:44:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 276613858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gdcproject.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gdcproject.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 276613858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::202 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708688684; cv=none; b=XREcRUFpD7oCgIpCqRvcNpdR6BR4Xob+QzUIkM/A3fHNaR345rgTrs6fwH4Ke3xUUs1PDbMKz158CHeHP+gLwOUTpiYAhPFJw68pyb7LYrxgNXgHqqvP61W93BfCQFDiRLeS9pVv/pkutT8JQ0EjBkdsbjgHa7zSF5Lt1sJxD9Y= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708688684; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c4s/+jk2WODyo+SCKHKDQGWJqckvKV92SVs+c4K2g9w=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Message-Id; b=vzdt4CkD3aHKL/5F1IACKLy1/SrAkQAfQ6pvSfhVx51pnKAYySIqlaJSuQx/DaFZWmsTya0QevmOD1F3dplrxLlz6gV2wx5x7cmW5gRJs14cImWd+ODVf++ndyfg3Gx5L39xPoy/BdfpQX0xkA/gI7VXlhqXFPLvLHivY0OqFds= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Th7Tg1yBXz9t18; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:44:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gdcproject.org; s=MBO0001; t=1708688679; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sT+zZtb+/Pm1ONtKDHXE8F0lXLYHvXO/sMORhwcErpo=; b=H2MG5RQLqROr/QAUF9ttufL/C8+jaav3L3DV/i8uEqnEydbDm+/xW44GihKzsilE7TEoi/ t2bMRkH/MNVAeTkB+7RJt/xqMOLwRnt9xn8zVQy76bOFcybXqb11gxeBQcBaFyv0eKFUw3 21uLO4kMWNOScTrrSOGO/jvkYGM6MamgS933823aCqFGssS/m+rENNxepV8syoYDRpgyKW +Kwu/IPBWGZctBQJ6eMwOANaIYB0RvDGVVPSiS3dZXOy6asUu9GqXngjlVZudwKxLCDvoV wBBZqkC14xpj/R/h8UO2Ux3vqsjujCUzuy2zylxb6bM5LgB9JEJ+pTLN/nDdXg== Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:44:30 +0100 From: Iain Buclaw Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] Add gcov MC/DC tests for GDC To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?q?J=F8rgen?= Kvalsvik Cc: hubicka@ucw.cz, richard.guenther@gmail.com References: <20240223111800.1209438-1-j@lambda.is> <20240223111800.1209438-2-j@lambda.is> In-Reply-To: <20240223111800.1209438-2-j@lambda.is> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1708688500.0c86gcc3bc.astroid@pulse.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Excerpts from J=C3=B8rgen Kvalsvik's message of Februar 23, 2024 12:18 pm: > This is a mostly straight port from the gcov-19.c tests from the C test > suite. The only notable differences from C to D are that D flips the > true/false outcomes for loop headers, and the D front end ties loop and > ternary conditions to slightly different locus. >=20 > The test for >64 conditions warning is disabled as it either needs > support from the testing framework or a something similar to #pragma GCC > diagnostic push to not cause a test failure from detecting a warning. >=20 > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >=20 > * gdc.dg/gcov.exp: New test. > * gdc.dg/gcov1.d: New test. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/gcov.exp | 44 + > gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/gcov1.d | 1712 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 1756 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/gcov.exp > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/gcov1.d >=20 I think I said this before in the previous series, no objections to adding more tests to the gdc testsuite. OK. Thanks, Iain.