From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20670 invoked by alias); 16 May 2014 16:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20595 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2014 16:57:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:57:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A466274D8FC; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r_U9utRRuPHi; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:57:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E16D92744E37; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:57:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Nicholas Clifton Subject: Re: RFA: Fix calculation of size of builtin setjmp buffer Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1744413.NRlNpZZtnl@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.10-1.29-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5375CC7B.7070202@redhat.com> References: <87wqdzjccp.fsf@redhat.com> <2347976.UgdYmbUUr8@polaris> <5375CC7B.7070202@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01308.txt.bz2 > OK - here is your version of the patch, extended with a comment which > I think is helpful for other people reading the code, and with the > changes to builtins.c and md.texi removed, since the size of the buffer > is not changing. > > Is this version OK to apply ? Yes, IMO that's fine, thanks. -- Eric Botcazou