From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10936 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2007 10:45:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10924 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2007 10:45:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:45:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lA8Aj8Iu000970 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:45:08 -0500 Received: from zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (vpn-14-118.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.118]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lA8Aj7OX001594; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:45:07 -0500 Received: from littlepinkcloud.COM (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id lA8Aj6d5022228; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:45:06 GMT Received: (from aph@localhost) by littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5/Submit) id lA8Aj57X022225; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:45:05 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18226.59569.569614.837534@zebedee.pink> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:45:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: stabilize java assertion tables In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.93.1 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva writes: > Using TYPE_UID rather than pointers to hash type_assertions shaved off > another 70 -fvar-tracking-assignments (and, probably -g vs -g0) > codegen differences. Now I'm down to four differences on > x86_64-linux-gnu libs, yay. > > Ok for trunk, after retesting in it (rather than in the vta branch) > completes? > > for gcc/ChangeLog.vta => gcc/java/ChangeLog > from Alexandre Oliva > > * java/expr.c (type_assertion_hash): Hash type uids rather > than tree pointers. > I guess so. I don't understand that fragment of code at all, but I'll trust you. Andrew.