From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10209 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2008 19:56:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 10199 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2008 19:56:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com (HELO aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com) (143.166.82.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:55:41 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,495,1199685600"; d="scan'208";a="334228878" Received: from unknown (HELO M31.equallogic.com) ([12.110.134.31]) by aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 14:55:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18393.33918.108982.224973@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:59:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: kris.van.hees@oracle.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++ References: <20080313193208.GE19427@oracle.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00831.txt.bz2 Is the u"foo" and U"foo" notation a standard? Other modifiers on literals (like 1L or 42U) are case insensitive. I wonder if it wouldn't be better for that to be true here as well. Perhaps the modifiers could be U"foo" and UL"foo" ? paul