* Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
@ 2008-09-09 13:56 Rainer Orth
2008-09-09 16:07 ` Jeff Law
2008-09-09 16:46 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2008-09-09 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
The following patch
PATCH: Don't redefine REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS on i386-pc-solaris2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01981.html
has remained unreviewed for more than a month. It is still required for
Solaris/x86 bootstrap, although that is currently broken by IRA (PR
bootstrap/37422).
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
2008-09-09 13:56 Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap Rainer Orth
@ 2008-09-09 16:07 ` Jeff Law
2008-09-09 16:36 ` Rainer Orth
2008-09-09 16:46 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2008-09-09 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: gcc-patches
Rainer Orth wrote:
> The following patch
>
> PATCH: Don't redefine REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS on i386-pc-solaris2
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01981.html
>
> has remained unreviewed for more than a month. It is still required for
> Solaris/x86 bootstrap,
OK. Please install.
> although that is currently broken by IRA (PR
> bootstrap/37422).
>
IIRC there are two outstanding codegen fixes for IRA related issues.
Obviously I'm hoping one of them fixes this problem. Hopefully we'll
get them both reviewed and installed shortly.
Thanks for your patience,
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
2008-09-09 16:07 ` Jeff Law
@ 2008-09-09 16:36 ` Rainer Orth
2008-09-10 9:54 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2008-09-09 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Law; +Cc: gcc-patches
Jeff Law writes:
> Rainer Orth wrote:
> > The following patch
> >
> > PATCH: Don't redefine REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS on i386-pc-solaris2
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01981.html
> >
> > has remained unreviewed for more than a month. It is still required for
> > Solaris/x86 bootstrap,
> OK. Please install.
Thanks, done as rev. 140157.
> > although that is currently broken by IRA (PR
> > bootstrap/37422).
> >
> IIRC there are two outstanding codegen fixes for IRA related issues.
> Obviously I'm hoping one of them fixes this problem. Hopefully we'll
> get them both reviewed and installed shortly.
I've just found that bootstrap on Solaris 10/x86 gets past stage3 if I
configure for i686-pc-solaris2.10 instead of the default of
i386-pc-solaris2.10. This probably explains why this didn't show up on
other x86 platforms.
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
2008-09-09 13:56 Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap Rainer Orth
2008-09-09 16:07 ` Jeff Law
@ 2008-09-09 16:46 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2008-09-09 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: gcc-patches
Rainer Orth wrote:
> The following patch
>
> PATCH: Don't redefine REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS on i386-pc-solaris2
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01981.html
Ok.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
2008-09-09 16:36 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2008-09-10 9:54 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2008-09-10 14:11 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2008-09-10 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: Jeff Law, gcc-patches
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I've just found that bootstrap on Solaris 10/x86 gets past stage3 if I
> configure for i686-pc-solaris2.10 instead of the default of
> i386-pc-solaris2.10. This probably explains why this didn't show up on
> other x86 platforms.
My FreeBSD builds are i386, and those have resumed succeeding a few days
ago after a couple of days of brokenness after the IRA merge. If you are
still seeing bootstrap fail on i386-pc-solaris vs i686-pc-solaris, that
would be a new issue.
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap
2008-09-10 9:54 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2008-09-10 14:11 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2008-09-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Jeff Law, gcc-patches
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > I've just found that bootstrap on Solaris 10/x86 gets past stage3 if I
> > configure for i686-pc-solaris2.10 instead of the default of
> > i386-pc-solaris2.10. This probably explains why this didn't show up on
> > other x86 platforms.
>
> My FreeBSD builds are i386, and those have resumed succeeding a few days
> ago after a couple of days of brokenness after the IRA merge. If you are
> still seeing bootstrap fail on i386-pc-solaris vs i686-pc-solaris, that
> would be a new issue.
Good point: since I hadn't seen a patch that seemed relevant, I hadn't
retried the bootstrap. I've just started one now (in a tree containing the
patch for PR 37377), and I'm already well into building the target libs.
Thanks for the hint.
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-10 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-09 13:56 Unreviewed patch: Solaris/x86 bootstrap Rainer Orth
2008-09-09 16:07 ` Jeff Law
2008-09-09 16:36 ` Rainer Orth
2008-09-10 9:54 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2008-09-10 14:11 ` Rainer Orth
2008-09-09 16:46 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).