From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22943858C52 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:27:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E22943858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E686A33E92; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:27:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (188-23-1-149.adsl.highway.telekom.at [188.23.1.149]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5905D33E99; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:27:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:27:47 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Rainer Orth cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Announce Solaris 11.3 obsoletion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1875a6a3-ea37-f694-9299-4ffea48934eb@pfeifer.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 18 Jan 2023, Rainer Orth wrote: > Here's the changes.html patch corresponding to the Solaris 11.3 > obsoletion notice in > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-December/240322.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608384.html > > Since this is the only obsoletion in GCC 13 so far, I haven't introduced > a toplevel bulletpoint as in GCC 9. That maks sense to me. > Ok? Yes, thank you! > Btw., I noticed the -gz=zstd addition is listed under Caveats. I don't > think this belongs here and probably only landed due to the -gz=zlib-gnu > removal above. Agreed. Can you address this on the way? Thanks, Gerald