From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119619 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2018 09:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119605 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2018 09:52:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:v133-v6, (unknown), HX-HELO:sk:mail-pg, H*r:sk:mail-pg X-HELO: mail-pg1-f169.google.com Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com (HELO mail-pg1-f169.google.com) (209.85.215.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 09:52:23 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id v133-v6so559587pgb.2 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0CmcfxJ3nW6ADcpYtT5d5WpoIGKgEYA/UY6QxmzceR4=; b=ET4Eqf+se4wZrwEjlNNvdIeuRBLQ2Zj1GiTN5NxFq1RKtrwsQKoQbsmJkCegK65fxS brY2q6Huf8wdzx/lqayDEz4Eqd1UlEU3MvPoAHO0W43RkKeBnuVIzHUUM3FQjZ8JrKhA HBQIf73chqvHgzIumpJouhy/1yfz2b/vcLd7mGY1BMYy7APIYMVMgztqx5duXYSvmOGO cgYG7/EJvcET+TWWepVM0cM+hQYWuv4rZI9jBTBAz6idbphQh3h6mRhQgnIyyo+xKWO8 +eoavPDfBPsI7bHlqyLb0V7gC8fi7/EhxKl7HuRCSzodRMLxwkgrBIsEOptPGlH0vwcz 2QwQ== Return-Path: <10walls@gmail.com> Received: from ?IPv6:2001:e68:4075:9f8:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a? ([2001:e68:4075:9f8:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h19-v6sm31733118pfk.71.2018.10.09.02.52.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: introduce --enable-mingw-full32 to default to --large-address-aware To: Alexandre Oliva , Joseph Myers Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <18c16bb7-c54f-f086-0e90-f06345be10d8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 11:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wEEMXDEzMawjdAD3CaOSb7BJIEcgNAVuf" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wEEMXDEzMawjdAD3CaOSb7BJIEcgNAVuf Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wZlTo1F5UKjGdq9hXFWE7OKGCmOYlXIkn"; protected-headers="v1" From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> To: Alexandre Oliva , Joseph Myers Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <18c16bb7-c54f-f086-0e90-f06345be10d8@gmail.com> Subject: Re: introduce --enable-mingw-full32 to default to --large-address-aware References: In-Reply-To: --wZlTo1F5UKjGdq9hXFWE7OKGCmOYlXIkn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1094 On 10/09/2018 04:59 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Oct 5, 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: >=20 >> A new configure option needs documenting in install.texi. >=20 > Ah, yes, thanks for the reminder. >=20 > On Oct 6, 2018, JonY <10walls@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 >> They're both OK as far as I can see. I just don't like the configure >> name implying all 32bit pointers are used by userspace. Perhaps just >> --enable-large-address-aware? >=20 > That might suggest the flag affects all targets, including Cygwin, so > I'm following the existing (undocumented) practice in suggesting > --enable-mingw-large-address-aware instead. Please let me know if you'd > rather not have mingw in the option name, and for it to affect (in the > --disable form) the Cygwin target as well. >=20 It is fine to turn it on by default in 32bit MinGW (i686-*-mingw*), but leave the defaults as is for others like Cygwin, I am not too sure of the effects for Cygwin. I don't think mingw should be in the configure name as this is applicable to all Win32 PE targets, it is a PE flag after all. --wZlTo1F5UKjGdq9hXFWE7OKGCmOYlXIkn-- --wEEMXDEzMawjdAD3CaOSb7BJIEcgNAVuf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 833 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5QrdnbBX9Ppk4bbPcTtf4pwUXUUFAlu8ej4ACgkQcTtf4pwU XUW9UA//bj88rQYRyNLun/5QE44NdRr22/xmyi+EqNzvYOdA06lcmErnheiGMbJW 3BSskISR2aEqkHZpKCsCFGni/LGcgSIME7RVb34Zm+Zt2sQSP37HnmhyQtU0hpyH tF3XJYjk/dwJGMYMrvFaQQtQvd3mDPUZ837nsgwkCHqNItIXpKhp0POH75OHO1iJ EVP/50AqnD6MgUUKdpoNZnbukwReKfvt0XkKiwsmOUoNtAQ87MmB8LId8jkvqRG0 EKWAESBfSBCbAhQqELg20DLdxPmULD42mpRUTIJlcZ8HsTg/yPkgL3Igt0IP2dGC +vnRJ2A07Pw2BU6y7+DPkjELUa8KAbSCy6UIlZci0rwQm87lIKG+/e8ZrpXUevvh iCnILK0qwgui9H3LBcxTGeIWV8kagM0fLaLVU/tJZAF3rRW9Wr8Dy8J0gZ59bDAB Bfr0LdF3u1MSljxmYNAclgJSPox24cukdGLvaIzlWvg3Hh8gp5sQty14WtGaRDiP ffsgo+5W9AM2PbWk9sNHiNchYrqiKi0YViJb8PSdy8QSmU+gGDLZ7OBEtQXy5DVy Kpvpb261XNMgM6//m0pliFooVoHM1XTp10Fspqc8XetBoTd+vDa35giEQLxWeb8N bK0UybxV87mKfrxz2is1aKyrKCXj5oxO+Zf+32bmfjDktQ7RIIA= =ul8s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wEEMXDEzMawjdAD3CaOSb7BJIEcgNAVuf--