From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94210 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2015 16:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93166 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2015 16:35:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net) (69.252.207.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:35:46 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id bUZl1r00A2D5gil01UblYA; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:35:45 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id bUbj1r0092ztT3H01Ubk9s; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:35:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [patch] New 'all' front end header reduction From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <563398C5.9010909@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:39:00 -0000 Cc: gcc-patches , Jeff Law Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19092CD5-53A8-4C2B-A1F8-1134218D51AB@comcast.net> References: <562A6614.5080602@redhat.com> <563372AF.9050002@redhat.com> <563398C5.9010909@redhat.com> To: Andrew MacLeod X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg03426.txt.bz2 On Oct 30, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > On 10/30/2015 12:07 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Oct 30, 2015, at 6:37 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >>> OK, here's the much delayed front end reduction patch based on the reor= dering already being checked in. >> So, Objective-C++ should be toggled on at least once for this. If it bu= ilds, it should be fine; though the entire objc++ test suite is tiny (by co= mparison to c). This can be done on linux or any host. > The final full native bootstrap and testsuite regressions were done whic= h included objcp and all the other languages not in this patch. So I thin= k it ought to be fine. Yes, as long as it was done once somewhere along the way, it should be fine.