From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 handling [PR106680]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:26:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <196abae2-10a3-6463-b3bb-66b5e583de43@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929183758.GB25951@gate.crashing.org>
Hi Segher & Iain!
on 2022/9/30 02:37, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:25:44PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> On 29 Sep 2022, at 18:04, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:16:33AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>> Which means that we do not report an error, but a warning, and then we force 64b on (taking
>>>> the user’s intention to be specified by the explicit ‘-m64’).
>>>
>>> And that is wrong. Any silent overriding of what the user says is bad.
>>
>> It is not silent - it warns and then carries on,
>
> Yes, but I meant the status quo. We agree :-)
>
>>> Not overriding it (and then later ICEing) is bad as well, so it should
>>> be an error here. And in generic code anyway.
>>
>> As noted, if that change is made we will see what the fallout is :)
>
> Hopefully it magically makes everything fine ;-)
Okay, if we want to unify the behavior everywhere in generic code,
I'll make a separated follow-up patch for it. :)
BR,
Kewen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-30 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 5:30 Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 6:37 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 16:18 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 19:09 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 5:45 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 8:16 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 9:12 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 16:14 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:25 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 9:26 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2022-09-29 17:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 12:15 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-03 21:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-10 2:15 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-10 13:58 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-12 8:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 21:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 23:04 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 23:16 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 17:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:33 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 22:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 6:16 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 18:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=196abae2-10a3-6463-b3bb-66b5e583de43@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).