public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	 kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
	 rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Make PHI initial value occupy live V_REG in dynamic LMUL cost model analysis
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 07:08:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1A1E953F3B0764C9+2023122307082554781885@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6463dca3-3af6-4226-aa6a-46e56b05b338@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3734 bytes --]

Committed. Thanks Jeff.



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-12-23 00:58
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Make PHI initial value occupy live V_REG in dynamic LMUL cost model analysis
 
 
On 12/22/23 02:51, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> Consider this following case:
> 
> foo:
>          ble     a0,zero,.L11
>          lui     a2,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
>          addi    sp,sp,-128
>          addi    a2,a2,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
>          mv      a1,a0
>          vsetvli a6,zero,e32,m8,ta,ma
>          vid.v   v8
>          vs8r.v  v8,0(sp)                     ---> spill
> .L3:
>          vl8re32.v       v16,0(sp)            ---> reload
>          vsetvli a4,a1,e8,m2,ta,ma
>          li      a3,0
>          vsetvli a5,zero,e32,m8,ta,ma
>          vmv8r.v v0,v16
>          vmv.v.x v8,a4
>          vmv.v.i v24,0
>          vadd.vv v8,v16,v8
>          vmv8r.v v16,v24
>          vs8r.v  v8,0(sp)                    ---> spill
> .L4:
>          addiw   a3,a3,1
>          vadd.vv v8,v0,v16
>          vadd.vi v16,v16,1
>          vadd.vv v24,v24,v8
>          bne     a0,a3,.L4
>          vsetvli zero,a4,e32,m8,ta,ma
>          sub     a1,a1,a4
>          vse32.v v24,0(a2)
>          slli    a4,a4,2
>          add     a2,a2,a4
>          bne     a1,zero,.L3
>          li      a0,0
>          addi    sp,sp,128
>          jr      ra
> .L11:
>          li      a0,0
>          ret
> 
> Pick unexpected LMUL = 8.
> 
> The root cause is we didn't involve PHI initial value in the dynamic LMUL calculation:
> 
>    # j_17 = PHI <j_11(9), 0(5)>                       ---> # vect_vec_iv_.8_24 = PHI <_25(9), { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }(5)>
> 
> We didn't count { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 } in consuming vector register but it does allocate an vector register group for it.
Yup.  There's analogues in the scalar space.  Depending on the context 
we might consider the value live on the edge, at the end of e->src or at 
the start of e->dest.
 
In the scalar space we commonly have multiple constant values and we try 
to account for them as best as we can as each distinct constant can 
result in a constant load.  We also try to find pseudos that happen to 
already have the value we want so that they participate in the 
coalescing process.  I doubt either of these cases are particularly 
important for vector though.
 
 
> 
> This patch fixes this missing count. Then after this patch we pick up perfect LMUL (LMUL = M4)
> 
> foo:
> ble a0,zero,.L9
> lui a4,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
> addi a4,a4,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
> mv a2,a0
> vsetivli zero,16,e32,m4,ta,ma
> vid.v v20
> .L3:
> vsetvli a3,a2,e8,m1,ta,ma
> li a5,0
> vsetivli zero,16,e32,m4,ta,ma
> vmv4r.v v16,v20
> vmv.v.i v12,0
> vmv.v.x v4,a3
> vmv4r.v v8,v12
> vadd.vv v20,v20,v4
> .L4:
> addiw a5,a5,1
> vmv4r.v v4,v8
> vadd.vi v8,v8,1
> vadd.vv v4,v16,v4
> vadd.vv v12,v12,v4
> bne a0,a5,.L4
> slli a5,a3,2
> vsetvli zero,a3,e32,m4,ta,ma
> sub a2,a2,a3
> vse32.v v12,0(a4)
> add a4,a4,a5
> bne a2,zero,.L3
> .L9:
> li a0,0
> ret
> 
> Tested on --with-arch=gcv no regression. Ok for trunk ?
> 
> PR target/113112
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> * config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc (max_number_of_live_regs): Refine dump information.
> (preferred_new_lmul_p): Make PHI initial value into live regs calculation.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/pr113112-1.c: New test.
OK assuming you've done the necessary regression testing.
 
jeff
 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-22  9:51 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-12-22 16:58 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-22 23:08   ` 钟居哲 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1A1E953F3B0764C9+2023122307082554781885@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).