public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <QING.ZHAO@ORACLE.COM>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: The performance data for two different implementation of new security feature -ftrivial-auto-var-init
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:17:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1CDF271D-8C6C-4350-84D1-272537E4BFC1@ORACLE.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2102020840030.17979@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>



> On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Richard,
>> 
>> I have adjusted SRA phase to split calls to DEFERRED_INIT per you suggestion.
>> 
>> And now the routine “bump_map” in 511.povray is like following:
>> ...
>> 
>> # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
>>  xcoor = 0.0;
>>  ycoor = 0.0;
>>  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
>>  index = .DEFERRED_INIT (index, 2);
>>  index2 = .DEFERRED_INIT (index2, 2);
>>  index3 = .DEFERRED_INIT (index3, 2);
>>  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
>>  colour1 = .DEFERRED_INIT (colour1, 2);
>>  colour2 = .DEFERRED_INIT (colour2, 2);
>>  colour3 = .DEFERRED_INIT (colour3, 2);
>>  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
>>  p1$0_181 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p1$0_195(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p1$0 => p1$0_181
>>  p1$1_184 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p1$1_182(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p1$1 => p1$1_184
>>  p1$2_172 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p1$2_185(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p1$2 => p1$2_172
>>  p2$0_177 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p2$0_173(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p2$0 => p2$0_177
>>  p2$1_135 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p2$1_178(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p2$1 => p2$1_135
>>  p2$2_137 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p2$2_136(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p2$2 => p2$2_137
>>  p3$0_377 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p3$0_376(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p3$0 => p3$0_377
>>  p3$1_379 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p3$1_378(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p3$1 => p3$1_379
>>  p3$2_381 = .DEFERRED_INIT (p3$2_380(D), 2);
>>  # DEBUG p3$2 => p3$2_381
>> 
>> 
>> In the above, p1, p2, and p3 are all splitted to calls to DEFERRED_INIT of the components of p1, p2 and p3. 
>> 
>> With this change, the stack usage numbers with -fstack-usage for approach A, old approach D and new D with the splitting in SRA are:
>> 
>>  Approach A	Approach D-old	Approach D-new
>> 
>> 	272			624			368
>> 
>> From the above, we can see that splitting the call to DEFERRED_INIT in SRA can reduce the stack usage increase dramatically. 
>> 
>> However, looks like that the stack size for D is still bigger than A. 
>> 
>> I checked the IR again, and found that the alias analysis might be responsible for this (by compare the image.cpp.026t.ealias for both A and D):
>> 
>> (Due to the call to:
>> 
>>  colour1 = .DEFERRED_INIT (colour1, 2);
>> )
>> 
>> ******Approach A:
>> 
>> Points_to analysis:
>> 
>> Constraints:
>> …
>> colour1 = &NULL
>> …
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> ...
>> callarg(53) = &colour1
>> ...
>> _53 = colour1
>> 
>> Points_to sets:
>> …
>> colour1 = { NULL ESCAPED NONLOCAL } same as _53
>> ...
>> CALLUSED(48) = { NULL ESCAPED NONLOCAL index colour1 }
>> CALLCLOBBERED(49) = { NULL ESCAPED NONLOCAL index colour1 } same as CALLUSED(48)
>> ...
>> callarg(53) = { NULL ESCAPED NONLOCAL colour1 }
>> 
>> ******Apprach D:
>> 
>> Points_to analysis:
>> 
>> Constraints:
>> …
>> callarg(19) = colour1
>> callarg(19) = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = callarg(19) + UNKNOWN
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> …
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> colour1 = &NONLOCAL
>> …
>> callarg(74) = &colour1
>> callarg(74) = callarg(74) + UNKNOWN
>> callarg(74) = *callarg(74) + UNKNOWN
>> …
>> _53 = colour1
>> _54 = _53
>> _55 = _54 + UNKNOWN
>> _55 = &NONLOCAL
>> _56 = colour1
>> _57 = _56
>> _58 = _57 + UNKNOWN
>> _58 = &NONLOCAL
>> _59 = _55 + UNKNOWN
>> _59 = _58 + UNKNOWN
>> _60 = colour1
>> _61 = _60
>> _62 = _61 + UNKNOWN
>> _62 = &NONLOCAL
>> _63 = _59 + UNKNOWN
>> _63 = _62 + UNKNOWN
>> _64 = _63 + UNKNOWN
>> ..
>> Points_to set:
>> …
>> colour1 = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL } same as callarg(19)
>> …
>> CALLUSED(69) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL index colour1 }
>> CALLCLOBBERED(70) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL index colour1 } same as CALLUSED(69)
>> callarg(71) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL }
>> callarg(72) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL }
>> callarg(73) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL }
>> callarg(74) = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL colour1 }
>> 
>> My question:
>> 
>> Is it possible to adjust alias analysis to resolve this issue?
> 
> You probably want to handle .DEFERRED_INIT in tree-ssa-structalias.c
> find_func_aliases_for_call (it's not a builtin but you can look in
> the respective subroutine for examples).  Specifically you want to
> avoid making anything escaped or clobbered.

Okay, thanks.

Will check on that.

Qing
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de <mailto:rguenther@suse.de>>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
> Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23 23:05 How to traverse all the local variables that declared in the current routine? Qing Zhao
2020-11-24  7:32 ` Richard Biener
2020-11-24 15:47   ` Qing Zhao
2020-11-24 15:55     ` Richard Biener
2020-11-24 16:54       ` Qing Zhao
2020-11-25  9:11         ` Richard Biener
2020-11-25 17:41           ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-01 19:47           ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-02  8:45             ` Richard Biener
2020-12-02 15:36               ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-03  8:45                 ` Richard Biener
2020-12-03 16:07                   ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-03 16:36                     ` Richard Biener
2020-12-03 16:40                       ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-03 16:56                       ` Richard Sandiford
2020-11-26  0:08         ` Martin Sebor
2020-11-30 16:23           ` Qing Zhao
2020-11-30 17:18             ` Martin Sebor
2020-11-30 23:05               ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-03 17:32       ` Richard Sandiford
2020-12-03 23:04         ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-04  8:50         ` Richard Biener
2020-12-04 16:19           ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-07  7:12             ` Richard Biener
2020-12-07 16:20               ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-07 17:10                 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-12-07 17:36                   ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-07 18:05                     ` Richard Sandiford
2020-12-07 18:34                       ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-08  7:35                         ` Richard Biener
2020-12-08  7:40                 ` Richard Biener
2020-12-08 19:54                   ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-09  8:23                     ` Richard Biener
2020-12-09 15:04                       ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-09 15:12                         ` Richard Biener
2020-12-09 16:18                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-05 19:05                             ` The performance data for two different implementation of new security feature -ftrivial-auto-var-init Qing Zhao
2021-01-05 19:10                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-12 20:34                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-13  7:39                                 ` Richard Biener
2021-01-13 15:06                                   ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-13 15:10                                     ` Richard Biener
2021-01-13 15:35                                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-13 15:40                                         ` Richard Biener
2021-01-14 21:16                                   ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-15  8:11                                     ` Richard Biener
2021-01-15 16:16                                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-15 17:22                                         ` Richard Biener
2021-01-15 17:57                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-01-18 13:09                                             ` Richard Sandiford
2021-01-18 16:12                                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-02-01 19:12                                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-02-02  7:43                                                   ` Richard Biener
2021-02-02 15:17                                                     ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2021-02-02 23:32                                                       ` Qing Zhao
2020-12-07 17:21           ` How to traverse all the local variables that declared in the current routine? Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1CDF271D-8C6C-4350-84D1-272537E4BFC1@ORACLE.COM \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).