From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82306 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 19:47:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82289 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 19:47:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:47:38 +0000 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so190817717wid.0 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:47:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.92.228 with SMTP id cp4mr232628wib.62.1429732055431; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.51] (85-127-9-55.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at. [85.127.9.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eh5sm9103068wic.20.2015.04.22.12.47.34 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:47:34 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <552BC0D0.6060401@redhat.com> References: <552BC0D0.6060401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: patch ping From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:47:00 -0000 To: Jeff Law ,GCC Patches Message-ID: <1EB0389B-2803-417B-BEFD-8A85A110A0E4@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01358.txt.bz2 On April 13, 2015 3:12:48 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote: >On 04/11/2015 04:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask an RM or global reviewer to kindly consider the >> following patches preventing one or the other target in >config-list.mk >> to build: >> >> [PATCH, bfin] handle BFIN_CPU_UNKNOWN in TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00034.html >OK. > >> >> [PATCH, c6x] handle unk_isa in TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00089.html >OK. > >> >> >> Cosmetic patchlets pending but probably for stage 1 now: >> >> Remove redundant guard in emit_bss() >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00337.html >OK. > >> >> tree-tailcall: Commentary typo fix, remove fwd declaration >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00342.html >OK. > >> >> s/ ;/;/g Makefile.tpl >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00380.html >OK > >Note there is a policy that requires all patches to be bootstrapped and > >regression tested. These are trivial enough that I'll approve them >as-is. However, in the future, please bootstrap and regression test >changes whenever possible. I'm aware of this policy. I did my best not to break other configs. By now all of the above were pushed including the erroneously committed https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01270.html to fix PR target/47122 vax-*-openbsd* config.gcc typo that Jakub was kind enough to confirm to be obvious on IRC. Thanks for your reviews! Since I touched Makefile.tpl and there was at least one other patch against it in GCC, i would be grateful if someone could synch Makefile.tpl back to binutils-gdb in two days or three so I can sleep well again a couple of days after that :) cheers,