From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toon@moene.org>
Received: from moene.org (moene.org [80.101.130.238])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8277C3858414;
 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:01:44 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8277C3858414
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=moene.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=moene.org
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=moene.org)
 by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <toon@moene.org>)
 id 1ms9Ju-000zzr-LL; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:01:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Fix setting of array lower bound for named arrays
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
References: <c8d8cac8-d066-cb1f-d1cc-c932f3edb89f@codesourcery.com>
 <a7ae88fa-5683-af6f-a8d0-59f997a822e6@gmx.de>
 <3ff664cf-c928-6179-d0d4-728401987264@codesourcery.com>
 <e6e2406c-6536-5174-2737-11b8c81482c0@gmx.de>
 <79ac1a54-7959-2aca-1ecb-2237155752b8@codesourcery.com>
 <c8501928-6de7-fb54-c002-f65f14ff1ee4@gmx.de>
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.org>
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Message-ID: <1c228369-35e6-0771-21b0-ee6ae7439a45@moene.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:01:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c8501928-6de7-fb54-c002-f65f14ff1ee4@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:01:46 -0000

On 11/30/21 8:54 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:

> Hi Tobias,

> You seem to be quite convinced with your interpretation,
> while I am simply confused.

If both compiler developers are confused, and actual compiler 
implementations differ in their outcomes of the test case, IMNSHO it is 
time to ask the Fortran Standardization Committee for an interpretation 
(of the standard's text).

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands