public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
	"Kong, Lingling" <lingling.kong@intel.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Liu, Hongtao" <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [APX CFCMOV] Support APX CFCMOV
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 11:22:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d06e4aa-6e76-4e8a-b9bb-3ec6af05c779@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc075cca-fb13-e411-38ac-4cc94777f157@ispras.ru>



On 6/14/24 11:10 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Kong, Lingling wrote:
> 
>> APX CFCMOV[1] feature implements conditionally faulting which means that all memory faults are suppressed
>> when the condition code evaluates to false and load or store a memory operand. Now we could load or store a
>> memory operand may trap or fault for conditional move.
>>
>> In middle-end, now we don't support a conditional move if we knew that a load
>> from A or B could trap or fault.
> 
> Predicated loads&stores on Itanium don't trap either. They are modeled via
> COND_EXEC on RTL. The late if-conversion pass (the instance that runs after
> reload) is capable of introducing them.
> 
>> To enable CFCMOV, we add a target HOOK TARGET_HAVE_CONDITIONAL_MOVE_MEM_NOTRAP
>> in if-conversion pass to allow convert to cmov.
> 
> Considering the above, is the new hook really necessary? Can you model the new
> instructions via (cond_exec () (set ...)) instead of (set (if_then_else ...)) ?
Note that turning on cond_exec will turn off some of the cmove support.

But the general suggesting of trying to avoid a hook for this is a good 
one.  In fact, my first reaction to this thread was "do we really need a 
hook for this".

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-14 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240614025749.743388-1-lingling.kong@intel.com>
2024-06-14  3:11 ` Kong, Lingling
2024-06-14  6:52   ` Richard Biener
2024-06-14  6:58     ` Liu, Hongtao
2024-06-14  8:10       ` Richard Biener
2024-06-14 17:10   ` Alexander Monakov
2024-06-14 17:22     ` Jeff Law [this message]
2024-06-17  3:04       ` Hongtao Liu
2024-06-18  7:40         ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Kong, Lingling
     [not found] ` <20240614025749.743388-2-lingling.kong@intel.com>
2024-06-14  3:11   ` [PATCH 1/3] [APX CFCMOV] Add a new target hook: TARGET_HAVE_CONDITIONAL_MOVE_MEM_NOTRAP Kong, Lingling
     [not found] ` <20240614025749.743388-3-lingling.kong@intel.com>
2024-06-14  3:11   ` [PATCH 2/3] [APX CFCMOV] Support APX CFCMOV in if_convert pass Kong, Lingling
     [not found] ` <20240614025749.743388-4-lingling.kong@intel.com>
2024-06-14  3:11   ` [PATCH 3/3] [APX CFCMOV] Support APX CFCMOV in backend Kong, Lingling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d06e4aa-6e76-4e8a-b9bb-3ec6af05c779@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=lingling.kong@intel.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).