From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60773 invoked by alias); 31 May 2017 17:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 60743 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2017 17:16:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-yw0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f177.google.com) (209.85.161.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:16:35 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id b68so9527117ywe.3 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G2UCl/bSj4TkJr57k00CyjxmZR9006y0xlvMt+56pY4=; b=CAae+MEBm71qzVf8mwSeTzp58Z3qwkijXjLKoJhbN17Z8KepIz8/F1EFBglGwcM0VV Lo6b4ueMtoV+4sBZITkSVVwx5oQLAP+kkHVL66pKZKjqTVggmbWqA0EJU4OzUE2bY1oR KjPSEmtGaI1DvbVca2r2kRJ5FmlPA881v3cLhJU2akoqh+vWqcFStUsrmMO1qq4pImLq g4/kKAPG/9UFIut7ml1xVjXqcAIpmePawFuvFAYJUWAWLw8f3gHEJxAjd6p8hX6eu6bO 7dDurlGgif+LzsQWg3dZ34KrnqUzR1AYtDme7LACGB4a9WkYtUUnRKgCS9p5smdn90JH k1Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBwPYc3RwaG+0CiO1v15T/YhEvvJBvJg+NA+FBR2lryXnce/NF5 jRYoqsb74Q20ug== X-Received: by 10.129.2.215 with SMTP id 206mr20175700ywc.65.1496250997664; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:7500:e7fb:4a6f:2254? ([2620:10d:c091:200::7:3f92]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i128sm7556237ywf.17.2017.05.31.10.16.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] lang_decl selector & decomposition To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: GCC Patches References: <21a65173-8939-e6d8-0fa5-278d7a64ec3d@acm.org> <20170531170545.GC24023@tucnak> From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: <1dae7652-350f-fdc1-fa12-270c83644dac@acm.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170531170545.GC24023@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg02392.txt.bz2 On 05/31/2017 01:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > That is weird, that sounds like a bug somewhere? Which testcase is it on? I think decomp25 & decomp7 & 8 (sorry, can't recall full name). I discovered them because my first attempt had an assert that the incoming base was the same as the stored one, for the already-converted case. It wasn't the case of turning a NULL into non-NULL. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell