From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817F3857C7A for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6817F3857C7A Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13G6XEnS076439 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:02:46 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37xs0tht7p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:02:45 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13G6Yx0u080414 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:02:45 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37xs0tht77-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:02:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13G6xXTO008098; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:44 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 37u3n8va0y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:43 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 13G72fqM18612534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:41 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5811BAE05A; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB28AE057; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-926bd7cc-2dd1-11b2-a85c-f6adc0f5efec.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.77.218]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:41 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Move gimplefe40.c and gimplefe41.c To: Richard Biener Cc: GCC Patches References: <495cec56-f914-d114-3882-fa9642d9ffce@linux.ibm.com> From: Robin Dapp Message-ID: <1e6af3a1-329f-905e-1282-08ddd9a75e21@linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:02:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: mLhDzV5phAgigewIzBirJwEzM3pc2kV6 X-Proofpoint-GUID: QuiUjBDe4D1Sx5RqRZWI-lFEUBi-YCXK X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-15_11:2021-04-15, 2021-04-15 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104160049 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:02:47 -0000 > Do the testcases currently fail? How? In principle moving to vect/ > is OK but then having the gimplefe testcases in one place is nice ... yes, they ICE on targets that do not have vector capabilities: gimplefe-40.c:7:1: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3821 Normally we run vector tests with a higher arch level (when going through lib/target-supports.exp via vect.exp check_vect_support_and_set_flags). [..] } elseif [check_effective_target_s390_vx] { lappend DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS "-march=z13" "-mzarch" set dg-do-what-default run [..] I suppose the same happens on powerpc, hence the dg-additional-options, but I haven't checked. Regards Robin